Glad I keep a copy of my IHUB posts as they seem t
Post# of 72445
(Total Views: 394)
Posted On: 04/16/2018 3:44:42 PM
Glad I keep a copy of my IHUB posts as they seem to get deleted within minutes. Gee, wonder who could be the person finding them offensive? I'm betting he lives somewhere between Vermont and Maine. Here it is, have asked admin to review it.
I am reading articles about the recent gas attack in Syria and how Russia is saying it was done secretly by Great Britain to try and make Syria look bad. I have to assume most everyone on this board believes this is total hogwash. Why? Because the historical evidence of being honest for both Syria and Russia is abysmal.
Now take this same logic to IPIX. They have shown remarkable restraint in dilution/financing to bring 3 drugs across many applications to the completion of P2 clinical trials, they have yet to have a trial failure, they have yet to have a trial safety issue of any magnitude, they have 20+CDAs signed showing remarkable interest from BPs across the board, they have given indication after indication that the upcoming B-OM trial final report is going to be outstanding for a $1B target market for which there is currently no treatment, they have consistently said that they will only announce deals once all P2 trials were completed and the final trial top line results are expected within a matter of weeks or so, and yet a handful of people spend the entire day speaking of IPIX as though it is on its last legs. Why? No credible arguments, just rehash of things that happened years ago and wild assumptions that cannot be factually supported. Now which side are you going to believe?
This is how apparent I feel the current clash of ideas is on this board. So go with your gut, evaluate the DATA closely, forget the rabid portents of doom with no supporting evidence, and choose who you read on this board and those that deserve no more of your time.
I am reading articles about the recent gas attack in Syria and how Russia is saying it was done secretly by Great Britain to try and make Syria look bad. I have to assume most everyone on this board believes this is total hogwash. Why? Because the historical evidence of being honest for both Syria and Russia is abysmal.
Now take this same logic to IPIX. They have shown remarkable restraint in dilution/financing to bring 3 drugs across many applications to the completion of P2 clinical trials, they have yet to have a trial failure, they have yet to have a trial safety issue of any magnitude, they have 20+CDAs signed showing remarkable interest from BPs across the board, they have given indication after indication that the upcoming B-OM trial final report is going to be outstanding for a $1B target market for which there is currently no treatment, they have consistently said that they will only announce deals once all P2 trials were completed and the final trial top line results are expected within a matter of weeks or so, and yet a handful of people spend the entire day speaking of IPIX as though it is on its last legs. Why? No credible arguments, just rehash of things that happened years ago and wild assumptions that cannot be factually supported. Now which side are you going to believe?
This is how apparent I feel the current clash of ideas is on this board. So go with your gut, evaluate the DATA closely, forget the rabid portents of doom with no supporting evidence, and choose who you read on this board and those that deserve no more of your time.
(6)
(0)