Another post most likely to get trashed, but I get
Post# of 72446
(Total Views: 353)
Posted On: 04/11/2018 11:21:25 AM
Another post most likely to get trashed, but I get steamed at the soft bashers.
If I had over $300K invested in a company, I doubt that I would trash one of it's main drugs by calling it "an old salt" and saying that nobody was taking it seriously except for the company, especially when I don't have a medical background and most likely am not even that well-versed on the actual chemical composition and properties of the drug. much less its MOA.
Then to make it worse, I state that I am eagerly awaiting the results of the P2B trial when I just said it was such a farce that nobody was taking it seriously. Of course, being that I am not in the medical field, I obviously know what "everyone" in that field is thinking?? Makes it sound like I am hoping that 2 + 2 = 7 as how could a drug that is a joke show efficacy, most likely a very high efficacy?
In my case, I would hold my tongue until the results came out rather than possibly crucify the drug erroneously. But hey, a $300K investment means something to me so I don't belittle the products.
This is the "soft bashing" of which I spoke though IMO it is more of trashing. Throw out a compliment or two but keep the pressure on that mgt is inept and the drugs must be voodoo because they have really proved little so far in passing thru P2 trials.
Same ol' same ol'
If I had over $300K invested in a company, I doubt that I would trash one of it's main drugs by calling it "an old salt" and saying that nobody was taking it seriously except for the company, especially when I don't have a medical background and most likely am not even that well-versed on the actual chemical composition and properties of the drug. much less its MOA.
Then to make it worse, I state that I am eagerly awaiting the results of the P2B trial when I just said it was such a farce that nobody was taking it seriously. Of course, being that I am not in the medical field, I obviously know what "everyone" in that field is thinking?? Makes it sound like I am hoping that 2 + 2 = 7 as how could a drug that is a joke show efficacy, most likely a very high efficacy?
In my case, I would hold my tongue until the results came out rather than possibly crucify the drug erroneously. But hey, a $300K investment means something to me so I don't belittle the products.
This is the "soft bashing" of which I spoke though IMO it is more of trashing. Throw out a compliment or two but keep the pressure on that mgt is inept and the drugs must be voodoo because they have really proved little so far in passing thru P2 trials.
Same ol' same ol'
(5)
(0)