I know we've had this discussion before, so as a r
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 335)
Posted On: 04/11/2018 9:34:45 AM
I know we've had this discussion before, so as a refresher of positions/debate/dialogue - you can't be for both sides of an issue simultaneously.
You can't sit here and outright lie, bash, etc and then exclaim "I'm promoting TPAC ICO!"
I guess a pathological liar would find some rationalization, but those of us who've been here long enough know better. The bigger question is why? Either you're a paid basher, a pathological liar, or a saboteur. What you are not, is a supporter of TPAC. Which is it?
You can't sit here and outright lie, bash, etc and then exclaim "I'm promoting TPAC ICO!"
I guess a pathological liar would find some rationalization, but those of us who've been here long enough know better. The bigger question is why? Either you're a paid basher, a pathological liar, or a saboteur. What you are not, is a supporter of TPAC. Which is it?
(3)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼