again i never expected seamless from a start up
my knowledge of OTC stock manipulation (which by default impacts the company) was minuscule re: crews and NR .. a decade back ..
it is crystal clear to me that PTOI was illegally orchestrated Up in December 2009
the difference for P2O .. is that as of today .. the company still survives and unlike most *targets* .. the Issued and Outstanding is manageable with mgmt's ability to execute
what i found so interesting in this K .. was the confirmation of a few *facts*
P2O's product output up into 2014
the fact that the company's founder has payables offset by sale of data recovery (consulting imo to P2O is and has been ongoing since departure)
the confirmation of something i directly confirmed with founder in summer of 2016
re: PTOI shares held (3M~) .. words used = *significant shareholder*
450 holders .. again consistently maintained *above 450* since P2O was wrested back in mid August 2013 .. which can be read as many remain *invested*
which is really telling because one of the reasons (among many) NR relentlessly compresses a target's PPS is to restrict (courtesy of various firms' policies or prohibitive fees) one's ability to add or buy *shares* .. there are many firms who won't allow buys/adds when a stock's PPS falls below 25c or 10c .. something i doubt many knew back in 2009/2010
regardless .. this sector is in its ascension .. and P2O remains the only public company currently .. i welcome competition that is public so true comps can be had
i am totally impressed with the 2 recent BoD adds .. i would like to see a truly indy BoD ..with the addition of a 3rd BoD add .. i would like to see an AGM held in 2018 .. i would like to see RC's group of investors deliver on monies this month .. so that process moves forward .. i would like updates out of mgmt regularly (at least when fins are filed) .. i would like to see a blog go live on P2O's website for sector related news .. and then progress following southern sites as warranted .. i would like to see a resolution for both blending site and NF plant .. i would like an update on the potential sites in Canada .. it would be nice to have mgmt's input on patent aspects
i suspect i am not alone in my wishes/wants ..
i do my part and email mgmt frequently .. i rarely get a response
i remain an investor .. not because i'm (to use crews' terms that denigrate) a bagholder or a stuckholder (i've recognized the risk in play since my first phone call to the boston office of the SEC back in Jan 2012) .. but because since early 2013 .. with former director's documentation that imo provided for the ouster of certain aromatics and those who did their bidding for a price ..i've been behind the *survival* of P2O 150% .. and contrary to what the crew likes to imply via posts every single PTOI *share* held by me was bought on the open market
there are many things *imo* that the founder would do differently with hindsight
and i've no doubts current CEO would too
but the reality is P2O remains as of today an OTC SURVIVOR .. and with the company's first sale/s .. aspects will change .. mgmt has clearly not cared about *new eyes or investors* .. i suspect that fact will change with P2O's first sale
and then it won't matter what the entrenched/embedded *crew* that has long since taken root via the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation *posts* here or there
4kids
my knowledge of OTC stock manipulation (which by default impacts the company) was minuscule re: crews and NR .. a decade back ..
it is crystal clear to me that PTOI was illegally orchestrated Up in December 2009
the difference for P2O .. is that as of today .. the company still survives and unlike most *targets* .. the Issued and Outstanding is manageable with mgmt's ability to execute
what i found so interesting in this K .. was the confirmation of a few *facts*
P2O's product output up into 2014
the fact that the company's founder has payables offset by sale of data recovery (consulting imo to P2O is and has been ongoing since departure)
the confirmation of something i directly confirmed with founder in summer of 2016
re: PTOI shares held (3M~) .. words used = *significant shareholder*
450 holders .. again consistently maintained *above 450* since P2O was wrested back in mid August 2013 .. which can be read as many remain *invested*
which is really telling because one of the reasons (among many) NR relentlessly compresses a target's PPS is to restrict (courtesy of various firms' policies or prohibitive fees) one's ability to add or buy *shares* .. there are many firms who won't allow buys/adds when a stock's PPS falls below 25c or 10c .. something i doubt many knew back in 2009/2010
regardless .. this sector is in its ascension .. and P2O remains the only public company currently .. i welcome competition that is public so true comps can be had
i am totally impressed with the 2 recent BoD adds .. i would like to see a truly indy BoD ..with the addition of a 3rd BoD add .. i would like to see an AGM held in 2018 .. i would like to see RC's group of investors deliver on monies this month .. so that process moves forward .. i would like updates out of mgmt regularly (at least when fins are filed) .. i would like to see a blog go live on P2O's website for sector related news .. and then progress following southern sites as warranted .. i would like to see a resolution for both blending site and NF plant .. i would like an update on the potential sites in Canada .. it would be nice to have mgmt's input on patent aspects
i suspect i am not alone in my wishes/wants ..
i do my part and email mgmt frequently .. i rarely get a response
i remain an investor .. not because i'm (to use crews' terms that denigrate) a bagholder or a stuckholder (i've recognized the risk in play since my first phone call to the boston office of the SEC back in Jan 2012) .. but because since early 2013 .. with former director's documentation that imo provided for the ouster of certain aromatics and those who did their bidding for a price ..i've been behind the *survival* of P2O 150% .. and contrary to what the crew likes to imply via posts every single PTOI *share* held by me was bought on the open market
there are many things *imo* that the founder would do differently with hindsight
and i've no doubts current CEO would too
but the reality is P2O remains as of today an OTC SURVIVOR .. and with the company's first sale/s .. aspects will change .. mgmt has clearly not cared about *new eyes or investors* .. i suspect that fact will change with P2O's first sale
and then it won't matter what the entrenched/embedded *crew* that has long since taken root via the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation *posts* here or there
4kids
Quote:Do what you wish, I don’t care what you do with h your our money or shares. BUT, remember...there a lot in “the filings” that never came to fruition over the years. So the filings and therefore the company, are really a reliable source of information. IMO
3
