Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Message Board

Yes, I believe naked shorts must cover after CTIX

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 72447
(Total Views: 269)
Posted On: 04/07/2018 1:34:23 PM
Avatar
Posted By: sox0407
Re: DaubersUP #44061
Yes, I believe naked shorts must cover after CTIX became IPIX. I know for a fact that the idea to expose naked shorts was suggested to Leo by some shareholders. It's very unlikely that Leo woke up one day and realized he dislikes the name Cellceutix so much that he's willing to spend time and money to change the name/CUSIP #. Don't forget, the whole website must be changed also. After consulting with Michael Sullivan, Leo decided to do it. That tells me Sullivan believed the change will expose naked shorts if they exist.

"Changing the stock cusip number results in each share with the old cusip number having to be exchanged for a share with the new cusip number, which causes each short position to have to prove the borrow. Naked short positions would be unable to comply and those positions could have to be covered by purchasing shares with the new cusip on the open market. "

https://groovevc.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/is-...t-squeeze/

Example: Amarantus - massive covering by naked shorts after name/CUSIP # change.

https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4897607

If IPIX's volume was similar to Amarantus, I would've said Alan was right long time ago. But that wasn't the case and that's when I decided to speak up.

https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4987459

Quote:
Wouldn’t the ticker change have created a squeeze?



(2)
(0)




Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  


Dont-give-up.jpg




Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us