i'm stating (and have for years) that the company
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 391)
Posted On: 04/04/2018 10:36:55 AM
Re: Commando911 #39234
i'm stating (and have for years) that the company has numerous options
one of which pertains to both the plant and the blending site
should the company construct agreements going forward with prospective customers .. P2O doesn't need the NF plant and/or the blending site
both can be sold .. perhaps to the same buyer
that said P2O can also keep NF and sell the blending site .. (something that has never made much sense to me per se) .. and use those proceeds to fund burn rate while first sale/s are executed (monies exchanged between buyer/seller)
P2O can lease the blending site (something i and others have advocated for for years) with an agreement written into the lease for use as needed at X cost
again the company has numerous options .. almost none of of which are ever discussed *here*
bottom line i know what i'm looking for next out of P2O .. i'm beyond impressed with the new director's skill sets business wise (JA) .. i also have the utmost respect for LB .. i view their addition as a positive in both the long and short term for P2O .. including *leverage*
bottom line is the next update out of P2O can and imo should include input on the
other sites' sales being worked .. the add of a 3rd BoD candidate .. the prelim date of the 2018 AGM .. RH's *intent* specific to NF plant's future .. RC's investor group updated ..patent input updated .. and so on
5 years for RH comes mid August 2018 .. JB's 5 year ban was up last month .. curious to see what is decided ..
btw i have no doubts the equipment can be modified to suit individual/respective customer's needs .. on an as needed basis .. provided of course the *ongoing* relationship remains in place .. as was noted in the K .. zero doubts interaction exists *regularly* between P2O's founder and P2O's CEO
4kids
one of which pertains to both the plant and the blending site
should the company construct agreements going forward with prospective customers .. P2O doesn't need the NF plant and/or the blending site
both can be sold .. perhaps to the same buyer
that said P2O can also keep NF and sell the blending site .. (something that has never made much sense to me per se) .. and use those proceeds to fund burn rate while first sale/s are executed (monies exchanged between buyer/seller)
P2O can lease the blending site (something i and others have advocated for for years) with an agreement written into the lease for use as needed at X cost
again the company has numerous options .. almost none of of which are ever discussed *here*
bottom line i know what i'm looking for next out of P2O .. i'm beyond impressed with the new director's skill sets business wise (JA) .. i also have the utmost respect for LB .. i view their addition as a positive in both the long and short term for P2O .. including *leverage*
bottom line is the next update out of P2O can and imo should include input on the
other sites' sales being worked .. the add of a 3rd BoD candidate .. the prelim date of the 2018 AGM .. RH's *intent* specific to NF plant's future .. RC's investor group updated ..patent input updated .. and so on
5 years for RH comes mid August 2018 .. JB's 5 year ban was up last month .. curious to see what is decided ..
btw i have no doubts the equipment can be modified to suit individual/respective customer's needs .. on an as needed basis .. provided of course the *ongoing* relationship remains in place .. as was noted in the K .. zero doubts interaction exists *regularly* between P2O's founder and P2O's CEO
4kids
Quote:
So are you still implying that the current machine, which is over 5 yrs old, is the end all be all in the world of pyrolysis? If the plant is sold, where will,the company do R&D for the next generation machine? After all, as we have been told, this is an emerging sector, evolving all the time....
Does anyone really think an already five yr old machine will be the god standard to infinity?
(3)
(0)