For those who have not read the filing... I sen
Post# of 82672
(Total Views: 380)
Posted On: 03/29/2018 12:55:24 PM
For those who have not read the filing...
I sent this privately to Z after reading the entire filing... and Z requested that I make my findings public.
Thanks for posting.
I just finished reading the filing. Very impressive. Great job at repeatedly displaying the incompetence and laxed ways of the Cali. district court.
The filing best describes SFOR's MFOOBA process as being the "golden child" of authentication systems. Because it is "complete OOBA".
I also noticed R&G is validating prior art patents, but they are not effective at securing user's credentials. Therefore SFOR's patents must also be valid but are much more comprehensive and solve a current problem (man-in-the-middle attacks) that non of the prior patents were capable of achieving.
GL
IMO
For those who have not read the filing and don't know what I mean by "complete" OOBA. YOU MUST READ FOR YOUR SELF .
I sent this privately to Z after reading the entire filing... and Z requested that I make my findings public.
Thanks for posting.
I just finished reading the filing. Very impressive. Great job at repeatedly displaying the incompetence and laxed ways of the Cali. district court.
The filing best describes SFOR's MFOOBA process as being the "golden child" of authentication systems. Because it is "complete OOBA".
I also noticed R&G is validating prior art patents, but they are not effective at securing user's credentials. Therefore SFOR's patents must also be valid but are much more comprehensive and solve a current problem (man-in-the-middle attacks) that non of the prior patents were capable of achieving.
GL
IMO
For those who have not read the filing and don't know what I mean by "complete" OOBA. YOU MUST READ FOR YOUR SELF .
(3)
(0)Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼