ROPES & GRAY APPEAL RESPONSE!!! GET READY FOR GREATNESS!!!
Knobbe Martins SecureAuth Lawfirm:
Jeremy Anapol
StrikeForce v. SecureAuth, No. 17-4314 (C.D. Cal.)
Jeremy was part of a team that defended SecureAuth in a patent infringement case where the plaintiff asserted 43 claims from three patents. The plaintiff had asserted one or more of the patents against numerous other defendants in Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Virginia. Jeremy drafted a case-dispositive motion to dismiss, convincing the court to invalidate all asserted claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101 prior to claim construction. SecureAuth was the last defendant to be sued on the asserted patents, but the first to prevail.
Mr. Anapol, you might want to remove this from off of your profile tomorrow!!!!
There has been much chatter related to the Federal Appeals court's changing view of the Alice 35/101 Supreme court ruling. I understand that many here feel like that should significantly assist Strikeforce/Ropes & Gray's appeal case.
I am here to tell you that none of that is necessary. Ropes & Gray (not to mention assistance from Blank Rome) doesn't need any help. In fact, I'll make another prediction, that other IP appeal cases later this year will reference SFOR's case to assist them. I'll remind everyone of that fact...LOL.
We will all (including the other infringers, SecureAuth & Knobbe Martins) realize either this weekend or Monday that there is no way out for SecureAuth. Ropes & Gray will embarrass the District court for ruling that there was no need to examine this infringement case because U.S. Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701 are not patent worthy just 38 days after the conclusion of the United States Patent Trial & Appeal Board sweeping Strikeforce victory in which Mr. Mark Kay stated:
"Not only did the USPTO deny the IPR's, but all of the IPR's were denied leaving DUO Security, Inc., Centrify Corporation, and Trustwave Holdings, Inc. with none of our claims being dropped. This is a positive and low percentage of occurrence. This means the Stay for 1 year or so doesn't happen. Instead it will only be some months delayed. We are very happy with this inter partes review decision and the great job our lawyers have done".
Conclusion: Get ready for next week as folks will quickly hear about R & G's scathing response to SecureAuth's/9th District Court's early Alice ruling/dismissal and read a Superstar's response. They sure had fun talking about OOBA & MFA have been around since ancient Greece and WWII, etc. Laughing all of the way. The laughing stops Monday and the chills begin.
Can you remember a moment in time when a well known Superstar stepped up and showed why he was the best?
Get ready for another moment...
Knobbe Martins SecureAuth Lawfirm:
Jeremy Anapol
StrikeForce v. SecureAuth, No. 17-4314 (C.D. Cal.)
Jeremy was part of a team that defended SecureAuth in a patent infringement case where the plaintiff asserted 43 claims from three patents. The plaintiff had asserted one or more of the patents against numerous other defendants in Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Virginia. Jeremy drafted a case-dispositive motion to dismiss, convincing the court to invalidate all asserted claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101 prior to claim construction. SecureAuth was the last defendant to be sued on the asserted patents, but the first to prevail.
Mr. Anapol, you might want to remove this from off of your profile tomorrow!!!!
There has been much chatter related to the Federal Appeals court's changing view of the Alice 35/101 Supreme court ruling. I understand that many here feel like that should significantly assist Strikeforce/Ropes & Gray's appeal case.
I am here to tell you that none of that is necessary. Ropes & Gray (not to mention assistance from Blank Rome) doesn't need any help. In fact, I'll make another prediction, that other IP appeal cases later this year will reference SFOR's case to assist them. I'll remind everyone of that fact...LOL.
We will all (including the other infringers, SecureAuth & Knobbe Martins) realize either this weekend or Monday that there is no way out for SecureAuth. Ropes & Gray will embarrass the District court for ruling that there was no need to examine this infringement case because U.S. Patent Nos. 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701 are not patent worthy just 38 days after the conclusion of the United States Patent Trial & Appeal Board sweeping Strikeforce victory in which Mr. Mark Kay stated:
"Not only did the USPTO deny the IPR's, but all of the IPR's were denied leaving DUO Security, Inc., Centrify Corporation, and Trustwave Holdings, Inc. with none of our claims being dropped. This is a positive and low percentage of occurrence. This means the Stay for 1 year or so doesn't happen. Instead it will only be some months delayed. We are very happy with this inter partes review decision and the great job our lawyers have done".
Conclusion: Get ready for next week as folks will quickly hear about R & G's scathing response to SecureAuth's/9th District Court's early Alice ruling/dismissal and read a Superstar's response. They sure had fun talking about OOBA & MFA have been around since ancient Greece and WWII, etc. Laughing all of the way. The laughing stops Monday and the chills begin.
Can you remember a moment in time when a well known Superstar stepped up and showed why he was the best?
Get ready for another moment...
7
