I respectfully disagree with your position that di

I respectfully disagree with your position that dilution is solely responsible for the decrease from $5.00 to .50. 30.6 million shares dilution which I agree caused some of the drop but is not responsible for a 90% decrease in share price. I wish you would make the time to read this a couple of times as it provides a blueprint for how the abusive naked shorters do what they do. I hope tomorrow to do more research which will cast additional light on the situation. The only way to prove naked shorting with certainty is to have a certificate pull and that just doesn't happen. Please make the time to read this with an open mind and yes it has been forwarded to Leo. Go IPIX!!!
https://smithonstocks.com/illegal-naked-short...on-scheme/