It does make more sense, and the 5 yr. chart can e

It does make more sense, and the 5 yr. chart can even be very misleading at par, since the stock price before the split was not $2/share at it's highest in early 2015, but rather around a penny. The 1 for 200 split would multiply the post split pps 200x, so the unadjusted price at the new ratio would be $2/share (which accounts for the early 2015 chart). If the stock AT THE TIME OF THE R/S had been around a penny, then the pps would actually now be up around $10/share.

Not to say it won't be successful, cause it very well may in this lucrative market, and it does have a better share structure at present, but they'll need to bring in strong revenues to avoid re-diluting that nice looking share structure. That's what bolsters my confidence with Rocky Mountain High Brands at this point. They have been busy laying the groundwork for what should be a sweet rate of revenue growth. We'll know one way or the other as 2018 rolls out, but I think we'll have a damn good idea from just what's reported in the first half.