Kelt, if a new alias shows up here without introdu

Kelt, if a new alias shows up here without introducing itself and repeats the same post, it would be labeled as a short/basher. Shortly after Mako’s first attack, Alan’s first post was FINRA short sales and so were the next ten posts. I’m not saying he’s part of the gang, but you can’t blame me for being skeptical based on his timing and content.

Most of you know I’m a facts guy. I don’t have a strong opinion unless I have something to back it up. Although I questioned Alan’s post and motive from the beginning, I didn’t have anything concrete to refute him. That all changed when Leo changed CTIX to IPIX. Amarantus showed naked shorts had to cover after name/CUSIP # change, but that wasn’t the case in IPIX. Also I believe I was able to explain why the SP continued to decline. The #1 reason was Aspire who sold an average of 65K shares since July 1, 2017.

https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4963550

I sent the above post to Alan over there and not even him said something, so I assume my post has some truths behind it. I welcome the naked shorting theorists to show me some actual #s like I did with Aspire to explain the continuous SP decline.

Here’s my closing argument. If Alan’s FINRA post really exposes naked shorting, affected companies such as IPIX would’ve sued the criminals long time ago. Nothing I say in my daily rebuttal can exonerate the criminals if they left actual evidence in the FINRA file. If the FINRA post doesn’t expose naked shorting, then it’s being misinterpreted.