I'm not even sure why you read this guy anymore.
Post# of 125016
(Total Views: 80)
Posted On: 02/23/2018 9:07:09 PM
I'm not even sure why you read this guy anymore.
If you had a drinking game where you got to raise a glass every time 'Mr. Perhaps' says either that or 'possibly' or it 'suggests' or it 'seemed', why....... you'd 'win'.
Fair question. Why yes, Mr. Mueller was 'invited' to do precisely that.
And how does any 'mess' qualify as obvious when 'seemed' appears in the same sentence?
If you had a drinking game where you got to raise a glass every time 'Mr. Perhaps' says either that or 'possibly' or it 'suggests' or it 'seemed', why....... you'd 'win'.
Quote:
But it it also raises the question whether Mr. Mueller was invited on the scene to prosecute any old thing that fell in his path. Or why he is ignoring the much more obvious smoking mess around his old FBI colleagues who seemed to have committed manifold acts of criminal misconduct in their pursuit of FISA warrants to gather intel on candidate Trump.
Fair question. Why yes, Mr. Mueller was 'invited' to do precisely that.
And how does any 'mess' qualify as obvious when 'seemed' appears in the same sentence? Quote:
Mueller has broader authority in his Russia investigation than Trump may realize
Natasha Bertrand
nbertrand@businessinsider.com Twitter feed
Jul. 21, 2017, 3:58 PM
President Donald Trump told the New York Times on Wednesday that he felt it would cross a line if special counsel Robert Mueller began to examine his business dealings as part of the probe into possible collusion between his campaign team and Russia.
"I think that's a violation," Trump said. "Look, this is about Russia."
In appointing Mueller, however, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein gave him broad authority not only to investigate "any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated" with Trump's campaign, but also to examine "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation."
Rosenstein also gave Mueller the power to investigate "any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)" — including perjury, obstruction of justice, destruction of evidence, and intimidation of witnesses.
The mandate's scope is similar to that given by then-Acting Attorney General James Comey to special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald in 2003 to investigate who leaked the identity of former CIA operative Valerie Plame.
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼