Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. MMEX Resources Corporation (MMEX) Message Board

There are two ways to look at it imo, one good, on

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 4466
(Total Views: 364)
Posted On: 02/23/2018 11:07:27 AM
Posted By: JLUT
Re: Bgmoney10 #1991
There are two ways to look at it imo, one good, one bad obviously:

Good:

MMEX has said that one of the purposes for the crownbridge arrangement is to pay down notes. If they need funding at the moment, they can either make a put to crownbridge or take a note. The crownbridge shares are immediately liquid in the market, where the note has a lock up before it converts. It could be argued that rather than make a put, MMEX is deciding to draw on the the note, and pre-pay it back via crownbridge at a higher pps which would require fewer shares for the crownbridge put. This is assuming that news is incoming that would help achieve that higher pps. It would also delay dilution pressure on any news.

Bad:

If MMEX has the option to draw a put of $100k @ a 20% pps discount, why would it use a note for $80k @ a 39% pps discount? Because they are worried about the immediate liquidity? If MMEX is worried about immediate liquitidy of the put shares, does that indicate that they are worried about pressuring the pps? If so, why? Does it as Bgmoney said indicate that news is not shortly imminent and thus they need to reach the QB requirement without financing news? And as a result they wish to avoid dilution at this moment.

Its able to be looked at either way. However you choose to view it, it certainly gives fresh ammo to the negative crowd, which is part of why I say I don't care for it at all.



(1)
(0)




MMEX Resources Corporation (MMEX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us