Reversal no-appeal,orig. decision not lawful Ap

Reversal no-appeal,orig. decision not lawful

Appealed on what basis? We want the supreme court to support a decision that was not made according to guidelines in patent infringement trials? A patent is a legal instrument., goes though a legal process and requires a lot of DD to prove your patent is legit. A judge cannot throw it out with out considering all the evidence. Because he wants to go back to his chambers and lure female staffer to watch porn in his chambers which he was removed as a judge for doing after the case.

So no appeal, just like a frivolous law suit that has no legal basis, no legal leg to stand on. Cant be appealed.

SFOR has a legal rock solid Patent, the real thing it has been challenged twice legally and has been validated both times. Because its real! Meets all the criteria. The top patent attorney firm in the world studied the patent for months before they took the job on a contingent basis.

The law was NOT applied correctly and it cannot go to supreme court, it has to be tried correctly by the standard of the law by the lower court. That is why it will be kicked back to the lower court with the clear guidance to do it right , according to the law this time.

So this time, No corrupt sexual harassing, abusing porno judge to save them, Secure Auth is going to be reamed out legally! And its going to hurt.