That's part of the problem John, he could tell us
Post# of 40989
I mean if he was insinuating that Mazars was representing him or the company, and it's actually not true, then I would imagine that Mazars would be pissed and come after Steve for using their name to help sell his stock. I mean, you just don't label off names openly in a public PR statement without somebody over at Mazers seeing this and saying, "Geez, this guy is saying we represent ON4 when we don't?" you know for dam sure they are going to see if Steve is financially benefiting from stating that he's using a pretty big financial company.
So I think Steve needs to explain to us what exactly Mazars role is here, if audited FINS will come and when they plan to have something done. I think that is the least of what I'd like to hear right now.