so i guess its my turn to ask- whats your point?
-nobody mentioned almost 2500 such NSF awards since 2010 totaling 3.2 billion dollars-ca 400 awards/year-which was part of my point-and since the well funded organizations either wouldn't apply or wouldn't qualify that gives NNLX a fair chance from what we know re the groundbreaking N-assay technology
those odds are better than zero-nobody promised NNLX would win an award- but following your logic to its conclusion are you (and the dumber post which agreed with you saying NNLX might as well not compete because they are not guaranteed an award- because thats the mo of bashers who reject things out of hand without giving companies a chance-which is what your aunt does-how anybody could think auntie was a long is beyond my belief) saying in effect NNLX should not even have applied because there is no guarantee of an award.
Lets hope NNLX's competition for such an award thinks that way but NNLX DID apply and according to the update both NNLX and the professional grantwriter likes their chances. As I said earlier,neither would waste their time if their chances were inconsequential.
But auntie and possibly you? would believe oh well we might as well not show up for the party- (even after the fact of NNLX application-this is what bashers do- they confuse the issue and retract the timeline to get people to reject all the good things the company has already done,including a professional grantwriting application). What if all the athletes did that in the olympics- "oh auntie- should i not even go to the olympics despite the decade of hardship training and accolades /awards I've already received-imprimaturs which indicate I have as much right to go to the olympics as anybody else."
Btw, in addition to the bashing games re the possible grant award,no positive attention whatsoever has been given by bashers to the much larger issue of the game changing strategy of selling patents in prescribed geographic areas- an award which could be as much as 35- 50 million....
-nobody mentioned almost 2500 such NSF awards since 2010 totaling 3.2 billion dollars-ca 400 awards/year-which was part of my point-and since the well funded organizations either wouldn't apply or wouldn't qualify that gives NNLX a fair chance from what we know re the groundbreaking N-assay technology
those odds are better than zero-nobody promised NNLX would win an award- but following your logic to its conclusion are you (and the dumber post which agreed with you saying NNLX might as well not compete because they are not guaranteed an award- because thats the mo of bashers who reject things out of hand without giving companies a chance-which is what your aunt does-how anybody could think auntie was a long is beyond my belief) saying in effect NNLX should not even have applied because there is no guarantee of an award.
Lets hope NNLX's competition for such an award thinks that way but NNLX DID apply and according to the update both NNLX and the professional grantwriter likes their chances. As I said earlier,neither would waste their time if their chances were inconsequential.
But auntie and possibly you? would believe oh well we might as well not show up for the party- (even after the fact of NNLX application-this is what bashers do- they confuse the issue and retract the timeline to get people to reject all the good things the company has already done,including a professional grantwriting application). What if all the athletes did that in the olympics- "oh auntie- should i not even go to the olympics despite the decade of hardship training and accolades /awards I've already received-imprimaturs which indicate I have as much right to go to the olympics as anybody else."
Btw, in addition to the bashing games re the possible grant award,no positive attention whatsoever has been given by bashers to the much larger issue of the game changing strategy of selling patents in prescribed geographic areas- an award which could be as much as 35- 50 million....
4
