Davids 2 fellow (and opposing) directors in Decisi
Post# of 876
(Total Views: 533)
Posted On: 01/13/2018 11:53:49 PM
Davids 2 fellow (and opposing) directors in Decision Zone,who have been trying to shut David out of said company, would logically want to buy Davids 15% ownership of Decision Zone to eliminate legal hassles and profit sharing going forward IF those opposing directors believe the technology has any future (which of course DecisionZones promulgations assure). Unless the opposing directors of Decision Zone deem themselves unaccountable and above the rule of law.
With Richard Haderers background advising companies re stock, WOLV went to a lot of trouble to keep their SEC filings status current until recently.
While waiting for resolution of these things to provide the necessary capital to move forward with WOLV'S objectives (since they haven't found venture capital to move forward), and having no working capital or presumably present ability to raise money via stock, WOLV may want to save the extra fees involved in being SEC reporting until more money is available.
I hope things are moving forward behind the scenes, but it seems like all the forces of the universe have conspired against these pennies,especially due to politically directed orders which began negatively impacting many thousands of pennies ca August 2009,at which time the previous admins anti-business political appointees were in charge of the agencies affecting stocks. As of last August,70% of the current USA admins pro-business political appointees still had not been approved by a divided congress-the greatest delay ever seen I believe.
Given the lawsuits by David Chalk and possibly WOLV against DecisionZone, perhaps the recent silence is due to behind the scenes activity re such.
Have all musings re these things gone private?
With Richard Haderers background advising companies re stock, WOLV went to a lot of trouble to keep their SEC filings status current until recently.
While waiting for resolution of these things to provide the necessary capital to move forward with WOLV'S objectives (since they haven't found venture capital to move forward), and having no working capital or presumably present ability to raise money via stock, WOLV may want to save the extra fees involved in being SEC reporting until more money is available.
I hope things are moving forward behind the scenes, but it seems like all the forces of the universe have conspired against these pennies,especially due to politically directed orders which began negatively impacting many thousands of pennies ca August 2009,at which time the previous admins anti-business political appointees were in charge of the agencies affecting stocks. As of last August,70% of the current USA admins pro-business political appointees still had not been approved by a divided congress-the greatest delay ever seen I believe.
Given the lawsuits by David Chalk and possibly WOLV against DecisionZone, perhaps the recent silence is due to behind the scenes activity re such.
Have all musings re these things gone private?
(0)
(0)