New to this board, but not to IHUB. Just want to say a couple things first, as I might post here from time-to-time. Tired of the 95% negativity on IHUB, BUT, some of the folks there have a right to be ticked off (just wish they wouldn't post the same nagging things over and over again - 50 times a day is too much). Being upfront about my stance on SFOR, I am going to, at times, be "in the middle" and agree with some IHUB people about SFOR's performance, but also agree with some on this board about SFOR's possible future. For example, some IHUBer's are too gloom and doom, but some here are way on the other side of the spectrum and think SFOR is a 100% slam dunk winner. Well, I've traded SFOR for about 7 years now and I can see why someone such as Surfkast on IHUB is ticked...he did go to SFOR's office - was not told there would not be a R/S, and then shortly later, there was a R/S. I luckily sold off just in time prior to the R/S otherwise I would have been mad too. Folks, the price per share is much closer to zero than 5 cents even after the Microsoft settlements, IPR, etc. Seems like SFOR has had very little control over their deals/contracts that are "many" and "large." I and others here and at IHUB that have over 3 years of SFOR experience have heard "large deals" numerous times, but the revenue ALWAYS has been peanuts. If SFOR were on Shark Tank, they would be laughed at for the amount of time they have been in business in relation to the small the amount of revenue they have generated. Laughable! However, lets see if Kay can post decent revenue within the first 6 months of this year...if it doesn't happen in the next 6 months, I highly doubt it ever will. I hope you guys are right here, and things will be turned around quickly because at under a penny - who knows when SFOR will have to resort back to financing that will take out of the common shareholder's hide again. Again, I hope you guys are right and want you to be right! My next posts will not be this long - best of luck all!
7
