"Although I do believe McAfee is done and just wai
Post# of 82686
(Total Views: 372)
Posted On: 12/28/2017 10:45:22 AM
"Although I do believe McAfee is done and just waiting on announcement approval! It's real obvious! "
I am waiting for deal announcements, now that the court cases are on hold. The McAfee announcement should work 2 fold IMO.
1) the announcement of McAfee deal should impact the PPS with a big upward trend, not just a small shot in the arm.
2) If McAfee is paying a royalty to ACS who will in turn pay SFOR a lisencing fee, then McAfee (a software technology household name) should be called to testify on SFOR's behalf during the appeal process. What I'm trying to say is that McAfee sees SFOR's OOBA as an idea that out performs any other type of existing inband system. This is in a way confirmation by an industry giant that SFOR has something no one else has or ever had (not even the Romans or the world wars or even God)...IMO. Mcafee by paying for the OOBA created by SFOR validates their patents. . IMO.
As far as the new subsidiary is concerned. I am hoping they hire 1 or 2 Blochchain authorities that are more than capable to give them a strong presence in the Blockchain arena. I have been reading about it and it appears to be a great concept but with security flaws. In Kays last interview he mentioned that the company would be the largest Blockchain security company in the U.S., or something to that effect. The ONLY way that could be possible would be if Kay is in talks with a major player in the Blockchain or the security business. Could it be that SFOR and McAfee are working together on that?
In the last interview he also mentioned there would be many PR's about the Blockchain security subsidiary.For someone who doesnt PR much to say that, sounds promising.
Like everyone else here... I am waiting for some promising news via 8-k or PR that can shed some light on any big stuff that has been going on that is so secretive.
Always IMO
I am waiting for deal announcements, now that the court cases are on hold. The McAfee announcement should work 2 fold IMO.
1) the announcement of McAfee deal should impact the PPS with a big upward trend, not just a small shot in the arm.
2) If McAfee is paying a royalty to ACS who will in turn pay SFOR a lisencing fee, then McAfee (a software technology household name) should be called to testify on SFOR's behalf during the appeal process. What I'm trying to say is that McAfee sees SFOR's OOBA as an idea that out performs any other type of existing inband system. This is in a way confirmation by an industry giant that SFOR has something no one else has or ever had (not even the Romans or the world wars or even God)...IMO. Mcafee by paying for the OOBA created by SFOR validates their patents. . IMO.
As far as the new subsidiary is concerned. I am hoping they hire 1 or 2 Blochchain authorities that are more than capable to give them a strong presence in the Blockchain arena. I have been reading about it and it appears to be a great concept but with security flaws. In Kays last interview he mentioned that the company would be the largest Blockchain security company in the U.S., or something to that effect. The ONLY way that could be possible would be if Kay is in talks with a major player in the Blockchain or the security business. Could it be that SFOR and McAfee are working together on that?
In the last interview he also mentioned there would be many PR's about the Blockchain security subsidiary.For someone who doesnt PR much to say that, sounds promising.
Like everyone else here... I am waiting for some promising news via 8-k or PR that can shed some light on any big stuff that has been going on that is so secretive.
Always IMO
(11)
(1)