Thanks for the response. I only bring it up bec
Post# of 82690
(Total Views: 211)
Posted On: 12/20/2017 2:02:04 PM
Thanks for the response.
I only bring it up because SFOR has created athe subsidiary company. This company, over the next 2-3 years IMO, will take off or flop. And I believe it will be directly tied to how cyptocurrency does in the short term.
Block Safe Technologies, Inc. is being set up due to the uncertainty of the future of crypto currency... if that is going to be thier focus. I can see blockchain being coupled with SFOR products for other uses, not just the uncertain bitcoin.
But if Block Safe Tech. Inc. gets a foothold in the blockchain market in banking, medical, govt., etc. there is no reason we cant be part of the movement.
In Marks interview he mentions that SFOR will be licensing the security products to the new subsidiary. The new subsidiary creates a nice buffer between the new market Mark is trying to tap into and the patent holding company. So its my belief that if the subsidiary does well SFOR will do well through royalty payments due to the licensing agreement (yet to be disclosed). But if the subsidiary flops, the company can just simply be shut down without, IMO, hurting SFOR value.
IMO
I only bring it up because SFOR has created athe subsidiary company. This company, over the next 2-3 years IMO, will take off or flop. And I believe it will be directly tied to how cyptocurrency does in the short term.
Block Safe Technologies, Inc. is being set up due to the uncertainty of the future of crypto currency... if that is going to be thier focus. I can see blockchain being coupled with SFOR products for other uses, not just the uncertain bitcoin.
But if Block Safe Tech. Inc. gets a foothold in the blockchain market in banking, medical, govt., etc. there is no reason we cant be part of the movement.
In Marks interview he mentions that SFOR will be licensing the security products to the new subsidiary. The new subsidiary creates a nice buffer between the new market Mark is trying to tap into and the patent holding company. So its my belief that if the subsidiary does well SFOR will do well through royalty payments due to the licensing agreement (yet to be disclosed). But if the subsidiary flops, the company can just simply be shut down without, IMO, hurting SFOR value.
IMO
(0)
(0)