Elsie,
Selective perception on your part. Deliberate and obvious intent to mislead.
You: "Gee. What's it been, about a year since the patents went up for sale and this is as close as we get for a sale."
The NanoLogix update:
"Since our first announcement of the offer of 12 July we have registered the patent in fourteen EU Patent Agreement signatory countries. That registration was completed by 7 September. At that time the official status of the FlatPack patent in Europe was recognized in those fourteen countries. Since 7 September, two of those countries, Sweden and Croatia, out of the fourteen countries in which the patent has been registered, have published that information in either their own national patent bulletins or the EU Patent bulletin. This publication step is generally required in order for a formal acceptance of the patent validity by interested parties. NanoLogix has no control over the timing of individual Country publication and hopes the remainder of the bulletin notifications could be completed by the end of the current quarter, fully realizing each country involved possesses its own separate bureaucracy and timetables. That stated, we are pleased to have had interest in the technology from companies in three European and adjacent countries."
NanoLogix did not have to tell us anything, but they did. They explained about patent issuance and registration and mentioned companies in three countries have shown interest.
They also mentioned China and the complications there with intellectual property (that would mean patents, in case you didn't know)
As for time elapsed for the sales effort, my understanding of when the patent could be sold is that it was dependent upon both registration (September 7) and individual registered countries publishing some announcement of the fact. So, your "about a year" is, in reality, at a maximum of about three months.
As I said, you have a severe case of deliberative selective perception and should seek help for it.
Scott
Selective perception on your part. Deliberate and obvious intent to mislead.
You: "Gee. What's it been, about a year since the patents went up for sale and this is as close as we get for a sale."
The NanoLogix update:
"Since our first announcement of the offer of 12 July we have registered the patent in fourteen EU Patent Agreement signatory countries. That registration was completed by 7 September. At that time the official status of the FlatPack patent in Europe was recognized in those fourteen countries. Since 7 September, two of those countries, Sweden and Croatia, out of the fourteen countries in which the patent has been registered, have published that information in either their own national patent bulletins or the EU Patent bulletin. This publication step is generally required in order for a formal acceptance of the patent validity by interested parties. NanoLogix has no control over the timing of individual Country publication and hopes the remainder of the bulletin notifications could be completed by the end of the current quarter, fully realizing each country involved possesses its own separate bureaucracy and timetables. That stated, we are pleased to have had interest in the technology from companies in three European and adjacent countries."
NanoLogix did not have to tell us anything, but they did. They explained about patent issuance and registration and mentioned companies in three countries have shown interest.
They also mentioned China and the complications there with intellectual property (that would mean patents, in case you didn't know)
As for time elapsed for the sales effort, my understanding of when the patent could be sold is that it was dependent upon both registration (September 7) and individual registered countries publishing some announcement of the fact. So, your "about a year" is, in reality, at a maximum of about three months.
As I said, you have a severe case of deliberative selective perception and should seek help for it.
Scott
13
