I believe Drano is correct on this. Any timelines
Post# of 72445
(Total Views: 395)
Posted On: 12/15/2017 7:25:55 AM
I believe Drano is correct on this. Any timelines applied to a deal involving Brilacidin are done so by individuals without access to all the information. Why would they make such a statement? What motivation? What about pending P and K results in any event?
I believe Drano was also correct on the concept of why the placebo numbers were higher than "expected". I have posted my reasoning on that from someone who has had direct contact with OM patients. Believe that or not, it is everyone's individual decision.
I did indeed state that a lozenge MIGHT be an effective delivery device-FOR CANDIDA! Been there and done that. These patients have a painful oral condition but it generally does not approach the discomfort level of OM patients. Will a delivery method other than swish and spit improve the performance of Brilacidin. Quite possibly but uncertain. IPIX scientists will do the very best that they can under the guidelines they must follow for the FDA.
40054 Drano 12/15/17-"I never stated that flu shots cause the flu"
39588 Drano 12/4/17-"A flu shot CAN cause the flu if it is not manufactured correctly"
Did someone misspeak at some point, forget what they had stated, or otherwise? Read and decide critically for yourselves.
I truly hate that this line of posting has degenerated to this state. Not what I intended and I have no ulterior motive for posting. Just wanted to add an opinion on why the placebo rates in the Brilacidin study could have been as observed. I believe IPIX will succeed and I am holding all the shares I have acquired over the past 4 years.
I believe that Drano thinks he is "policing" this board and is honestly trying to protect it from what he thinks is a dishonest poster. He is 100 percent wrong on this but I don't really believe his motivations are in question. The above posts are highlighted not to damage him but to illustrate that something can be stated in error or lapse of memory.
Bottom line-read everything critically but apply some logic to it. Everyone posting (or moderating) has some motivation for doing so. Whether it is overt manipulation, subtle manipulation, simply trying to help, or looking for validation.
And remember, Scottsmith is a MODERATOR on the other site. Sometimes things don't make a lot of sense.
I believe Drano was also correct on the concept of why the placebo numbers were higher than "expected". I have posted my reasoning on that from someone who has had direct contact with OM patients. Believe that or not, it is everyone's individual decision.
I did indeed state that a lozenge MIGHT be an effective delivery device-FOR CANDIDA! Been there and done that. These patients have a painful oral condition but it generally does not approach the discomfort level of OM patients. Will a delivery method other than swish and spit improve the performance of Brilacidin. Quite possibly but uncertain. IPIX scientists will do the very best that they can under the guidelines they must follow for the FDA.
40054 Drano 12/15/17-"I never stated that flu shots cause the flu"
39588 Drano 12/4/17-"A flu shot CAN cause the flu if it is not manufactured correctly"
Did someone misspeak at some point, forget what they had stated, or otherwise? Read and decide critically for yourselves.
I truly hate that this line of posting has degenerated to this state. Not what I intended and I have no ulterior motive for posting. Just wanted to add an opinion on why the placebo rates in the Brilacidin study could have been as observed. I believe IPIX will succeed and I am holding all the shares I have acquired over the past 4 years.
I believe that Drano thinks he is "policing" this board and is honestly trying to protect it from what he thinks is a dishonest poster. He is 100 percent wrong on this but I don't really believe his motivations are in question. The above posts are highlighted not to damage him but to illustrate that something can be stated in error or lapse of memory.
Bottom line-read everything critically but apply some logic to it. Everyone posting (or moderating) has some motivation for doing so. Whether it is overt manipulation, subtle manipulation, simply trying to help, or looking for validation.
And remember, Scottsmith is a MODERATOR on the other site. Sometimes things don't make a lot of sense.
(0)
(0)