Hmmmm. To quote the last share holders letter.....
Post# of 22456
First consider an educmacated definition.
“deliberate
[adjective dih-lib-er-it; verb dih-lib-uh-reyt]
adjective
carefully weighed or considered; studied; intentional:
a deliberate lie.
characterized by deliberation or cautious consideration; careful or slow in deciding:
Moving away from the city and all its advantages required a deliberate decision.”
Now re read the part on delaying the filling....
“The late filing enhanced our ability to deal with the action of a lender,....”
I would argue this was done afte careful deliberation. A deliberate choice. To not file.
Twist itnhownyounwant Duff. When a company chooses a path like this that risks corporate value and stack value in the eyes of the market it is an action that demands consideration.
QD’s are a huge market to develop. I have not said once we may not be a part of it. I have asked questions regarding choices made without clear updates. Risks that can and are damaging shareholder value.
Dance how you want. Call me a basher. The rebuts is pumper. Something not said in rebuttal by myself. These are logical questions asked by any investor seeing red and watching decisions that do not comply with exchange regulations.
This is not a day trader issue. Or a long issue. This is a shareholder issue/concern. All of our capital is risked with an endeavour like this.
This is also not daily business operations. As that would be complying with daily business requirements. Which include filing. Timely updates. Meeting stated commitments made publicly.
A shareholder issue. Again my message was clear. Even their paid stock promoter/guide has no info or update.
Read the SEC guidelines. Deliberately not filing reports is a big offence. One that can trigger investigation. Not something to be pushed off by calling one a basher. Critical thought would demand more..... unless thought is not accepted when not inline with promotion only.....
Food for thought......