gtrtr. Thanks. It was also misleading for that per

gtrtr. Thanks. It was also misleading for that person to state that everyone was a "bagholder" when in fact the vast majority of shares bought at .0003 / 4 /5 since August 23 have been by repeat traders specifically accumulating them - both by topping up the bid and letting it fill (not pulling it) and by hitting the ask when sensible - to keep control of as much as possible of a relatively small float for a stock in this price range and hence keep as many shares as possible out of the hands of the 1/2-tick basher / flippers.

That is the key to the multiple repeat runs towards the correct market cap for a $2M revenue company each year when PRs reach the wider investing community and capture attention with the impressive results.

I even saw a positive post on iHub recently to that effect by another savvy trader who "gets it" [which makes at least 5 now].

However long one has to wait, a stock like $DIGX is far more predictable and profitable on a repeat basis than one of the 500M > 1 Billion per tick / 1 or 2 Billion per day traded stocks in the same price range in which there are literally hundreds of iHub mentality people in it with as many losers as winners per run.

With $DIGX, everyone has had ample opportunity to get in at the bottom price of .0003 x .0004. At the time of the Q3, there were 51 shareholders of record which is a manageable number. Each significant post here consistently gets 20 to 30 views (often higher), so the majority of shareholders - particularly all the large-scale holders - are not going to get duped by iHub nonsense on that minority interest / minority influence board.

"Per Ardua Ad Astra" - "Through Adversity To The Stars"

A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..

All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.