Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Message Board

Example using IPIX B-OM phase2 percentages. Letâ€

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 72446
(Total Views: 281)
Posted On: 12/12/2017 12:41:32 PM
Posted By: Mo
Example using IPIX B-OM phase2 percentages. Let’s use the low and more conservative 60% for placebo vs the more realistic 75% number seen in previous trials. So if there were 1000 patients being treated with Throat and Neck cancer at least 600 would get OM without any treatment to PREVENT getting OM. If those same 1000 patients did a simple swish and spit 3 times a day with B there would be 368 people that still would get OM meaning 232 of the 600 would NOT GET the OM disease by using B. (Per protocol population of 36.8% so 368 people vs 600 people). Reducing the odds of getting OM by 38.66% (232/600). So using the conservative 60 placebo number B will reduce the chances of GETTING OM by 38.66%. Using a more realistic number of 75% instance of getting OM that number goes from 38.66% to 50.93% PREVENTION rate. If you could reduce your chances of getting a disease that makes it extremely difficult to eat, drink or swallow by 39-51% by doing a simple swish and spit would you do it? If you were a doctor that cared for your patient’s well-being would you subscribe it? BTW, there were ZERO instances of SAE related to B (extremely safe to use). As others have mentioned we haven’t even seen secondary data to see improvements of symptoms using B which is gravy on top of meeting the study’s primary endpoint. I am a retired computer sales guy with zero medical background. Do you think the medical and business people in big pharma with full access to all the data under NDA will figure this out? My money says they will/have.


(1)
(0)




Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us