I thought Mako was thought by some to be the reinc
Post# of 72440
Here is the article:
https://seekingalpha.com/article/2010691-nano...mmendation
Here is the court decision to dismiss as protected opinion:
https://cases.justia.com/new-york/other-court...1404425073
I believe that court decision is the very reason why CTIX did not immediately go after Mako with a defamation lawsuit. Even if there was no money to be won, just getting that article taken down would have been worth millions for us. Unfortunately, precedent was set a year earlier on this type of matter in the NNVC case. I'm not aware of a successful suit against Seeking Alpha since then.
Even if they're not the same, Mako and PumpS/T are cut from the same cloth. Activist short-sellers who at best push the envelope of what is legal. So NNVC did suffer the same type of attack. Obviously it feels worse with CTIX/IPIX because we're invested and they're making trial progress unlike NNVC.
Go IPIX!