Here are some interesting articles to read. http:
Post# of 82668
![](/assets/46931549/no_avatar_available_thumb.jpg)
http://www.patentdocs.org/patent_office_rules_procedures/
Two of the articles in the link have examples on how USPTO determine the eligibility of a patent.
#1
January 19, 2017
USPTO Publishes Business Method Subject Matter Eligibility Examples: Part I
#2
January 22, 2017
USPTO Publishes Business Method Subject Matter Eligibility Examples: Part II
Anyone interested cand search for the following keywords and read through the examples.
Example 34
Example 35
Example 36
After reading the articles and examples, by no means can I believe SFOR's patents are not patent eligible according USPTO's standards.
Was there a formal debate in California court for the judge to reach the decision against SFOR's favor? Anyone has the related court documents?
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)