I know a lot of us are investigating and speculati
Post# of 82672
Is it possible that
MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT.87 ) The Motion is GRANTED with prejudice. Because it has been determined that the Asserted Patents are invalid,
is referring to section 1 or an amended item from the following Z jumpshare?
https://jumpshare.com/v/1tyhRJKxEPIkeTkxMdrV
It looks like SecureAuth tried to use some patents to justify their arguments. Could it be those patents that are invalid?
Thanks