... the bad guys are getting real nervous about the J&J lawsuit and the progress of the company.
Why would this be true? Every basher on this board, except for risk-it and one new guy (2 posts), claims to own stock. Why would these people trash their own investments, and do so multiple times every day?
I am more concerned with the people who have Berman derangement syndrome. These are dangerous people. They appear to hate him so much that they continuously attach socio-pathological behavior traits to him. They have attacked his wife and son and named them in public forums.
What kind of person does these type of things? Are these people getting paid? All of these arguments are the same. For example, one of the arguments made regularly on this message board is made by AC. No audited financials. OK, that's an argument. But the company has not had an auditor that isn't in jail, banned to practice, or disappeared (Linkedin profile not updated since 2014) since they filed 3Q 2013. That makes it very hard to get a new auditor. But then I got to thinking. AC makes this case daily, sometimes many times each day, yet he claims to have been a shareholder for two years (I don't believe it for one minute). But lets take him at his word. During AC's two years the company has not reported through the SEC Web Site, or the two years before that because it cannot. It does the best it can and reports GAAP financials on OTC Markets. Nonetheless, AC acts like this is some sort of criminal conspiracy or character trait flaw on Mr. Berman's part. Nonsense!
But AC is trying to have everyone believe that what Mr. Berman is trying to do is a capital crime, even while he bought his shares knowing that the company reported but doesn't report on the SEC site. That is hyper-hypocritical and suggests either an iHub agenda or a TAUG thug agenda.
I am also amazed daily by how little many of the "trader" posters do not really know or understand how a corporation works. Or, what are the rights and privileges of a shareholder. Shareholders cannot demand cash dividends. State laws empower Boards of Directors with the duties and responsibilities of the corporation. Shareholders can only vote their shares.... period. The CEO doesn't work for shareholders. The company receptionist doesn't either. The CEO works at the pleasure of the Board. The CEO is not bound to do what a shareholder(s) want. The CEO is not charged with providing stock traders and stock flips with a leg up on their trading habits. All shareholders and interested parties are entitled to four reports in a 12 month period of time. That's it. I would venture to say that all of the bashers on this board, and the number is growing, have no idea how hard CEOs work and how little discretionary time they have to double, triple, over the top inform curious shareholders.
I have written many times, that if shareholders don't like the job Mr. Berman is doing, then apply for the job yourselves. Put together and run your own slate of directors.
Enough said.
Why would this be true? Every basher on this board, except for risk-it and one new guy (2 posts), claims to own stock. Why would these people trash their own investments, and do so multiple times every day?
I am more concerned with the people who have Berman derangement syndrome. These are dangerous people. They appear to hate him so much that they continuously attach socio-pathological behavior traits to him. They have attacked his wife and son and named them in public forums.
What kind of person does these type of things? Are these people getting paid? All of these arguments are the same. For example, one of the arguments made regularly on this message board is made by AC. No audited financials. OK, that's an argument. But the company has not had an auditor that isn't in jail, banned to practice, or disappeared (Linkedin profile not updated since 2014) since they filed 3Q 2013. That makes it very hard to get a new auditor. But then I got to thinking. AC makes this case daily, sometimes many times each day, yet he claims to have been a shareholder for two years (I don't believe it for one minute). But lets take him at his word. During AC's two years the company has not reported through the SEC Web Site, or the two years before that because it cannot. It does the best it can and reports GAAP financials on OTC Markets. Nonetheless, AC acts like this is some sort of criminal conspiracy or character trait flaw on Mr. Berman's part. Nonsense!
But AC is trying to have everyone believe that what Mr. Berman is trying to do is a capital crime, even while he bought his shares knowing that the company reported but doesn't report on the SEC site. That is hyper-hypocritical and suggests either an iHub agenda or a TAUG thug agenda.
I am also amazed daily by how little many of the "trader" posters do not really know or understand how a corporation works. Or, what are the rights and privileges of a shareholder. Shareholders cannot demand cash dividends. State laws empower Boards of Directors with the duties and responsibilities of the corporation. Shareholders can only vote their shares.... period. The CEO doesn't work for shareholders. The company receptionist doesn't either. The CEO works at the pleasure of the Board. The CEO is not bound to do what a shareholder(s) want. The CEO is not charged with providing stock traders and stock flips with a leg up on their trading habits. All shareholders and interested parties are entitled to four reports in a 12 month period of time. That's it. I would venture to say that all of the bashers on this board, and the number is growing, have no idea how hard CEOs work and how little discretionary time they have to double, triple, over the top inform curious shareholders.
I have written many times, that if shareholders don't like the job Mr. Berman is doing, then apply for the job yourselves. Put together and run your own slate of directors.
Enough said.
4
