Perhaps I should be more clear. I meant to say the
Post# of 72434
4kids thinks naked shorting started four years ago and I don’t think his theory could explain what happened in the beginning. To elaborate, the stock went to ~$5 in December 2014. There wasn’t any partnership or uplist, so were the naked shorters forced to cover? If not, how come they allowed the stock to run to ~$5 if they could naked short as much as they want? One possible explanation - there weren’t any significant naked short positions. Not looking to argue, just a few thoughts.
Good luck to your Gamecocks tonight!
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX) Stock Research Links
![Dont-give-up.jpg](https://styleshack.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Dont-give-up.jpg)