Saying that something will 'not be proven', at thi
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 158)
Posted On: 11/19/2017 10:13:12 AM
Saying that something will 'not be proven', at this stage, is what is 'wrong'
I've read that there is a DOJ guideline that mandates that charges/indictments not be brought unless there is evidence
sufficient to secure a guilty verdict, or presumably to 'role' a witness to 'give up' another 'target'.
Whether or not the DNC break-in is at the heart of this mess is literally immaterial. Obstruction and perjury will be at the core of Mueller's charges with layers of money laundering around both.
And this is spot on:
I've read that there is a DOJ guideline that mandates that charges/indictments not be brought unless there is evidence
sufficient to secure a guilty verdict, or presumably to 'role' a witness to 'give up' another 'target'.
Whether or not the DNC break-in is at the heart of this mess is literally immaterial. Obstruction and perjury will be at the core of Mueller's charges with layers of money laundering around both.
And this is spot on:
Quote:
But the other, more innocent explanation is that they’re, as Gerson puts it, “a group of people for whom truth, political honor, ethics and integrity mean nothing.”
In other words, they’re collectively so divorced from normal standards of ethics and legality that they’re incapable of imagining how to behave in an innocent manner, even when they didn’t actually have the competence to pull off some grand conspiracy.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼