No I dont have a need for a unlicensed company giv
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 127)
Posted On: 11/17/2017 1:46:44 PM
No I dont have a need for a unlicensed company giving me trading advice. Plus I have yet to see any proof they are making any money for TPAC or any of the 8 people who were brainwashed by IR to believe in the MRVB.
Perhaps if you could supply some actual data with verifiable numbers that the MRVB is real I would change my mind. Im simply doing what S7 said every good shareholder should do. Im looking for proof in filings and this dumb dumb cant find any. So if that makes me stupid then it also means the people you claim are doing so great are stupid as well because Im following their advice and looking for verifiable proof.
So please lets see some actual proof instead of attacks and name calling. We are both in the same boat here and I cant understand why you guys are so bitter because Im trying to find answers like we were told to do. It has been stated the window is shut and nobody could join the TPAC FIC now anyway. Why so defensive when those of us on the outside want answers to why we cant find any evidence of proof there is a MRVB? Doesnt make sense for you to attack me. If you are actually making money using the service Bill offered then good for you. I dont see a reason to attack those who choose not to use the service. I tried to research them and I didnt like what my DD uncovered so I chose not to participate. The information they were requesting in my opinion was unlawful so I told IR I did not want to be verified. Yes I had an account and was in the waiting room just didnt like the demands that they were asking to move to the next step. How does that make me a bad person?
Still looking for proof TPAC is under reconstruction
Need an 8k showing MRVB revenue
Need Form 4 or SC-13d of shares actually being purchased by the MRVB
Need Legal document giving SI proxy over TPAC.
Anything to support all the claims made by IR/SI/Muse
Perhaps if you could supply some actual data with verifiable numbers that the MRVB is real I would change my mind. Im simply doing what S7 said every good shareholder should do. Im looking for proof in filings and this dumb dumb cant find any. So if that makes me stupid then it also means the people you claim are doing so great are stupid as well because Im following their advice and looking for verifiable proof.
So please lets see some actual proof instead of attacks and name calling. We are both in the same boat here and I cant understand why you guys are so bitter because Im trying to find answers like we were told to do. It has been stated the window is shut and nobody could join the TPAC FIC now anyway. Why so defensive when those of us on the outside want answers to why we cant find any evidence of proof there is a MRVB? Doesnt make sense for you to attack me. If you are actually making money using the service Bill offered then good for you. I dont see a reason to attack those who choose not to use the service. I tried to research them and I didnt like what my DD uncovered so I chose not to participate. The information they were requesting in my opinion was unlawful so I told IR I did not want to be verified. Yes I had an account and was in the waiting room just didnt like the demands that they were asking to move to the next step. How does that make me a bad person?
Still looking for proof TPAC is under reconstruction
Need an 8k showing MRVB revenue
Need Form 4 or SC-13d of shares actually being purchased by the MRVB
Need Legal document giving SI proxy over TPAC.
Anything to support all the claims made by IR/SI/Muse
(1)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼