Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Message Board

Most of this could (should) have been up a long ti

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 404)
Posted On: 11/10/2017 3:35:21 PM
Posted By: thesmallsV2
Re: MakZak #19781
Most of this could (should) have been up a long time ago with direct communication with shareholders in an open format. Bill didnt like my questions on the relationship/compensation but he also wouldnt do a CC so these could be addressed in an open format. I had a lot of concerns based on their treatment of shareholders, their grandiose claims, etc. He should have put a stop to it a long time ago. This would have been a moot point. Instead, they kept pumping while long term shareholders were given the eveything is OK by Bill while the price was collapsing and OS started taking off. Then there was the move to Wyoming to save $10K and shareholders were specifically told it was NOT because of the unlimited AS and that it wouldnt go up. Plenty of tweets documented on that one.

Kind of came to a head when kmohr threatened Bill on here to "drop this" and he has been mostly silent since. With the way everyrhing eent down and the blatant misinformation from IR (with respect to BTL SLA and OS reductions) - I think shareholders have every right to question the company, IR/SI, and demand transparency.



(2)
(0)




Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us