SFOR BVTK Connection, to use the words "Indeed the
Post# of 82672
(Total Views: 824)
Posted On: 11/09/2017 6:00:02 AM
Re: Blinkeedotcom #6199
SFOR BVTK Connection, to use the words " Indeed there is a connection" out of my words, is a stretch.
"
"I brought it up because on other BB Gold49er seemed to indicate there was indeed a connection.
Since our board has higher standards for veracity, I don't know if Gold would be willing to go on record here about it."
I was humbled by the request of some asking me to join in the discussions here, and to have one of my first posts be to disagree with someone's assessment of my words is not what I wishe'd for.
I used the words Suspected, If and imo. These words in no way Confirm anything, or are mean a Point of Fact.
This I understand was perhaps just perhaps a poor choice of using the wrong word "indeed" and a simple mistake.
None the less, I must point out what my statement that I posted on the other board implied, just for clarification.
Indeed
used to emphasize a statement or response confirming something already suggested.
"it was not expected to last long, and indeed it took less than three weeks"
synonyms: as expected, to be sure; in fact, in point of fact, as a matter of fact, in truth, actually, as it happens/happened, if truth be told, admittedly; archaicin sooth
"there was, indeed, quite a furor"
What I stated :
"I had Suspected a BVTK NDA with SFOR when the SFOR Partnership was removed from the BVTK website Right after it was posted here.
If such NDA exists, (it does imo) this bodes temedously well for SFOR, and will bring about more Contracts/Deals of that I am quite sure of, as I've done lots of DD on BVTK."
I used these words to show some doubt in my statement. Why ? Because as I recall someone had written an email to Mark Kay, and he denied there was a Partnership with BVTK, and STRIKEFORCE was removed almost instantly from BVTK's Document.
My thoughts were at the time and still are, is why would Strikeforce be listed on BVTK's Website in the first place ? How would BVTK even know about StrikeForce Technologies, besides the fact they are both have products dealing in Cyber Security ?
To clarify further, BVTK's Website did not say StrikeForce Technologies.
It only said " STRIKEFORCE "
With Strikeforce's Business Model being to form Strategic Partnerships and allowing Partners to do most of the Work in gaining recognition of their product and doing distribution, it was easy to assume there was a connection, especially when Bravatek's Business is based on MAPS (Market Alliance Program) and to receive a Finders Fee for Finding Deals/Contracts for its MAPS", which they do quite well, just ask DarkPulse Technologies.
I can't say enough Great things about BVTK and the background of its CEO and the Vast Connections he has in Government, Military, NATO and Ptivate Connections across the Globe. Which is why I also stated
"If such NDA exists, (it does imo) this bodes temedously well for SFOR, and will bring about more Contracts/Deals of that I am quite sure of, as I've done lots of DD on BVTK."
If any connection does or did exist, StrikeForce may not have liked the large Finders Fee that BVTK was asking for Most Finders Fees which are around 20 to 35%, when the Average Finders Fees are around 10%. BVTK's Finders Fee is most likely high, due to the CEO's Vast Connections and those of other Executives of BVTK and the almost instant results they get for their MAPS on Hundreds of Million & Billion Dollar Deals. BVTK chooses MAPS based on their State-of-Art Technologies and the Uniqueness of their products. Which is another reason why i think StrikeForce would fit right in with BravaTek.
So as you asked Blinkee, I have gone on Record and made the Investors Hangout SFOR aware of my statement, along with a clarification of my words and justifications on why I have such an "Opinion".
Readers are free to make up in their own mind, if my reasoning is with or without Merit or Justification.
Just so everyone here knows, I am known for long winded posts on the other board. So if you want to read mostly short posts, please skip mine, I promise you I won't be offended.
Thank you for inviting me. I have not posted here as I was putting in alot of time on the other board for a year with DD and attemping to record keep the record straight, and calling out "so called experts in certain areas" as misleading the Longs and Newbies with what they were saying. I believe many from that board will a test to that and the Rather Long Debates that ensued.
I also spent a large amount of time posting DD on my own close knit SFOR/BVTK board mostly free of Clutter and no Bashers.
49'er
https://youtu.be/v1_Qd7bKNvs
"
"I brought it up because on other BB Gold49er seemed to indicate there was indeed a connection.
Since our board has higher standards for veracity, I don't know if Gold would be willing to go on record here about it."
I was humbled by the request of some asking me to join in the discussions here, and to have one of my first posts be to disagree with someone's assessment of my words is not what I wishe'd for.
I used the words Suspected, If and imo. These words in no way Confirm anything, or are mean a Point of Fact.
This I understand was perhaps just perhaps a poor choice of using the wrong word "indeed" and a simple mistake.
None the less, I must point out what my statement that I posted on the other board implied, just for clarification.
Indeed
used to emphasize a statement or response confirming something already suggested.
"it was not expected to last long, and indeed it took less than three weeks"
synonyms: as expected, to be sure; in fact, in point of fact, as a matter of fact, in truth, actually, as it happens/happened, if truth be told, admittedly; archaicin sooth
"there was, indeed, quite a furor"
What I stated :
"I had Suspected a BVTK NDA with SFOR when the SFOR Partnership was removed from the BVTK website Right after it was posted here.
If such NDA exists, (it does imo) this bodes temedously well for SFOR, and will bring about more Contracts/Deals of that I am quite sure of, as I've done lots of DD on BVTK."
I used these words to show some doubt in my statement. Why ? Because as I recall someone had written an email to Mark Kay, and he denied there was a Partnership with BVTK, and STRIKEFORCE was removed almost instantly from BVTK's Document.
My thoughts were at the time and still are, is why would Strikeforce be listed on BVTK's Website in the first place ? How would BVTK even know about StrikeForce Technologies, besides the fact they are both have products dealing in Cyber Security ?
To clarify further, BVTK's Website did not say StrikeForce Technologies.
It only said " STRIKEFORCE "
With Strikeforce's Business Model being to form Strategic Partnerships and allowing Partners to do most of the Work in gaining recognition of their product and doing distribution, it was easy to assume there was a connection, especially when Bravatek's Business is based on MAPS (Market Alliance Program) and to receive a Finders Fee for Finding Deals/Contracts for its MAPS", which they do quite well, just ask DarkPulse Technologies.
I can't say enough Great things about BVTK and the background of its CEO and the Vast Connections he has in Government, Military, NATO and Ptivate Connections across the Globe. Which is why I also stated
"If such NDA exists, (it does imo) this bodes temedously well for SFOR, and will bring about more Contracts/Deals of that I am quite sure of, as I've done lots of DD on BVTK."
If any connection does or did exist, StrikeForce may not have liked the large Finders Fee that BVTK was asking for Most Finders Fees which are around 20 to 35%, when the Average Finders Fees are around 10%. BVTK's Finders Fee is most likely high, due to the CEO's Vast Connections and those of other Executives of BVTK and the almost instant results they get for their MAPS on Hundreds of Million & Billion Dollar Deals. BVTK chooses MAPS based on their State-of-Art Technologies and the Uniqueness of their products. Which is another reason why i think StrikeForce would fit right in with BravaTek.
So as you asked Blinkee, I have gone on Record and made the Investors Hangout SFOR aware of my statement, along with a clarification of my words and justifications on why I have such an "Opinion".
Readers are free to make up in their own mind, if my reasoning is with or without Merit or Justification.
Just so everyone here knows, I am known for long winded posts on the other board. So if you want to read mostly short posts, please skip mine, I promise you I won't be offended.
Thank you for inviting me. I have not posted here as I was putting in alot of time on the other board for a year with DD and attemping to record keep the record straight, and calling out "so called experts in certain areas" as misleading the Longs and Newbies with what they were saying. I believe many from that board will a test to that and the Rather Long Debates that ensued.
I also spent a large amount of time posting DD on my own close knit SFOR/BVTK board mostly free of Clutter and no Bashers.
49'er
https://youtu.be/v1_Qd7bKNvs
(3)
(0)Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼