Posted this on the other board to RAM. Man he piss
Post# of 82672
When you're dealing with a "Patent Play" it's more than collecting from infringing companies and collecting licensing fees and monetary compensation for harm done to your company(and being called a "troll" for doing so). It is owning a product that is in demand. People want and need what is in demand and if it is exploitable, they will try to obtain it to exploit it themselves. Some will go to any length to exploit what is not theirs to do so. Others will compromise and seek to purchase what could amount to a major windfall to their business. If several companies find their business to be lacking without this product a bidding war may issue to obtain this product (this is all very elementary as I hope you see the difference between a troll and a viable marketable product). SFOR is a product(s) IN DEMAND. If there is not a deal already on the table to purchase this company a bidding war may ensue. Collecting on what you own is good business. Watching others profit from what you own is not. Call it what you will, but these patents are for sale and after reading the patents, I'm ALL IN.The upside potential is ridiculous and my account confirms that as does ALL of the credible due diligence done here. The IPR was more more than a leg to stand on, it is the law on your side. I don't care what your position is but listening to your contradictory rhetoric day after day is quite exhausting and throws doubt into common sense. Flip to your hearts content, you'll be gone soon enough. I'm here for the LONG haul.