I believe WhaleFarmer was referring to this statem
Post# of 82689
(Total Views: 241)
Posted On: 10/29/2017 8:32:59 PM
I believe WhaleFarmer was referring to this statement from ZPaul;
My reasoning behind 30 days was based on the fact that although the PTAB's decision not to institute cannot be appealed, the petitioner(s) can still challenge the PTAB's decision by requesting a rehearing under 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(d). The rehearing request must be filed within 30 days of the PTAB's decision not to institute IPR for which no prior authorization from the PTAB is needed.
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4815242
My reasoning behind 30 days was based on the fact that although the PTAB's decision not to institute cannot be appealed, the petitioner(s) can still challenge the PTAB's decision by requesting a rehearing under 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(d). The rehearing request must be filed within 30 days of the PTAB's decision not to institute IPR for which no prior authorization from the PTAB is needed.
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=4815242
(1)
(0)