I am all for shareholders forcing $TPAC, IR, and S
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 456)
Posted On: 10/27/2017 11:07:25 PM
Re: Ragz2Richez #19687
I am all for shareholders forcing $TPAC, IR, and SI into court to explain the disconnect and double messaging between them and Bill/company.
James most certainly and unequivocally said the BTL contract was guaranteed and the $13.5MM was the baseline for revenues going forward. He was speaking directly on behalf of the company. Bill later said there was never a contract. If James was speaking out of turn - Bill should have immediately corrected the record as well as adjusting the expectations on uybacks/OS that James stated. Maybe the SEC wohld compel them to explain the disconnect. Be a little difficult for Bill to say they are a separate entity and dont speak for the company when they were listed as the IR contact on the PRs.
But that is really a side point. As far as HJOE - they never claimed they were going to buyback shares or tell investors a move to a no AS limit state was to save $9K. Further - when attacked by toxic lenders - they fought back and made an agreement witb SEC to go dark instead of having shareholders wiped out by the grays. TPAC nust went to Wyoming and dilution has run rampant since.
Lets not forget IR saying no-bid would never happen as the MRVBs were designed to prevent that very occurrence.
Plenty of examples of manipulation/lying by the related parties.
And Bill attacked me for saying I lied about the company being pumped being pumped. He never did provide any other examples or proof.
So yeah - I have no issue with lawsuits or investigations. If there isnt real transparency to some of the above by EOY - I will pen an open letter to the SEC myself and share it on here. I wasnt trading this stock - I had a long term horizon. That was obviously foolish in hindsight since all of the claims from the above entities seem to have been blatant BS. For me - it would be worth spending $5K-10K or so on a joint suit to get answers/justice for those long term shareholders . Even if I only recovered enough to pay for the attorneys it would be worth it for me to disengorge them of ill gotten gains.
James most certainly and unequivocally said the BTL contract was guaranteed and the $13.5MM was the baseline for revenues going forward. He was speaking directly on behalf of the company. Bill later said there was never a contract. If James was speaking out of turn - Bill should have immediately corrected the record as well as adjusting the expectations on uybacks/OS that James stated. Maybe the SEC wohld compel them to explain the disconnect. Be a little difficult for Bill to say they are a separate entity and dont speak for the company when they were listed as the IR contact on the PRs.
But that is really a side point. As far as HJOE - they never claimed they were going to buyback shares or tell investors a move to a no AS limit state was to save $9K. Further - when attacked by toxic lenders - they fought back and made an agreement witb SEC to go dark instead of having shareholders wiped out by the grays. TPAC nust went to Wyoming and dilution has run rampant since.
Lets not forget IR saying no-bid would never happen as the MRVBs were designed to prevent that very occurrence.
Plenty of examples of manipulation/lying by the related parties.
And Bill attacked me for saying I lied about the company being pumped being pumped. He never did provide any other examples or proof.
So yeah - I have no issue with lawsuits or investigations. If there isnt real transparency to some of the above by EOY - I will pen an open letter to the SEC myself and share it on here. I wasnt trading this stock - I had a long term horizon. That was obviously foolish in hindsight since all of the claims from the above entities seem to have been blatant BS. For me - it would be worth spending $5K-10K or so on a joint suit to get answers/justice for those long term shareholders . Even if I only recovered enough to pay for the attorneys it would be worth it for me to disengorge them of ill gotten gains.
(0)
(1)