I was asking because the military has to ship in f

I was asking because the military has to ship in fuel for their generators. It's very dangerous to ship fuel in a war zone as you need convoys that can be attacked to transport the fuel.

If the technology can be used to reduce energy consumption up to 40 percent it would be a major breakthrough.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=135262048[/url]

Not my DD but good DD none the less.

Quote:

---

Fazync and the company bottom line as we know is performance. I'm in agreement, there is tremendous market potential with the DoD. In FY 2006, the DoD used almost 30,000 gigawatt hours (GWH) of electricity, at a cost of almost $2.2 billion. I am sure those numbers have increased over the last 11 years. Fazync devices deployed with the DoD globally could easily save the government $400 to $800 million per year in energy costs (*accounting 1/2 for heating/electric and in 2006 numbers).

---