Hahaha!!!!! Sorry to laugh at your expense.
Post# of 82687
(Total Views: 391)
Posted On: 10/22/2017 10:13:33 PM
Hahaha!!!!!
Sorry to laugh at your expense.
Just read through all the posts after you presented a question you should have known the answers to from simple DD, its all in the filings.
Here is why PPS should be different.
Longs here believe, after much back and forth and digging, that MSFT Azure had not really infringed yet so SFOR's measly $10MM covered the Phone Factor infringements and the License was for MSFT's future use of the patents (under NDA so no one knows about $). I dont believe this has changed. If it has someone correct me.
Fast forward to today. All the companies SFOR is going after 100% rely on the SFOR OOBA patents to be able to service their customers. IF they were to lose the ability to use the OOBA patent that SFOR holds they would have to resort to unsecure inband authentication (not secure).
Also the current infringers (DCT) helped our cause by challenging our patents. They lost!!! This was not done with MSFT, most likely because MSFT would stretch the litigation process for years, which SFOR was not in a position to do.
So now we have the backing of the USPTO that has reinforced that our patents are indeed ours and all claims being challenged to date through the defense are BS. So R&G as of last week started to submit the PTAB results to the courts handling the infringement cases.
Now please do more digging, Zpauls posts, and really research what is going on .
Oh the large deals should also affect PPS. The talks started after MSFT settlement and should be announced before end of year. Look on ACS website to get some hints. And en email was posted with other clients (supplied by ACS).
AND your friends need to do work. Thats the only way to truly understand and appreciate what is transpiring here!
Hope this helps.
Do your own DD to confirm.
IMO
Sorry to laugh at your expense.
Just read through all the posts after you presented a question you should have known the answers to from simple DD, its all in the filings.
Here is why PPS should be different.
Longs here believe, after much back and forth and digging, that MSFT Azure had not really infringed yet so SFOR's measly $10MM covered the Phone Factor infringements and the License was for MSFT's future use of the patents (under NDA so no one knows about $). I dont believe this has changed. If it has someone correct me.
Fast forward to today. All the companies SFOR is going after 100% rely on the SFOR OOBA patents to be able to service their customers. IF they were to lose the ability to use the OOBA patent that SFOR holds they would have to resort to unsecure inband authentication (not secure).
Also the current infringers (DCT) helped our cause by challenging our patents. They lost!!! This was not done with MSFT, most likely because MSFT would stretch the litigation process for years, which SFOR was not in a position to do.
So now we have the backing of the USPTO that has reinforced that our patents are indeed ours and all claims being challenged to date through the defense are BS. So R&G as of last week started to submit the PTAB results to the courts handling the infringement cases.
Now please do more digging, Zpauls posts, and really research what is going on .
Oh the large deals should also affect PPS. The talks started after MSFT settlement and should be announced before end of year. Look on ACS website to get some hints. And en email was posted with other clients (supplied by ACS).
AND your friends need to do work. Thats the only way to truly understand and appreciate what is transpiring here!
Hope this helps.
Do your own DD to confirm.
IMO
(1)
(0)