IM having a tough time trying to figure this one o
Post# of 82687
(Total Views: 228)
Posted On: 10/20/2017 5:48:08 PM
IM having a tough time trying to figure this one out. I just read through some cases, but most are the plaintiff trying to make the amendments of contention to add claims. . And everywhere i read, it explains how something substancial (in this case the IPR dismissal) must occur for an ammendment to be approved late in the game.
I believe this may be going to trial and the three have to remove all their prior contensions because they dont apply anymore due to the PTAB dismissing all of their claims. Trial means treble damages if it doesnt already. But im sure they can give up and just pay the piper treble if they choose to.
So if Duo is being sued for $30M. Times three would be $90M. They are up $h!ts creek without a paddle. This may drain Duo of all their new funding any profits they may have made to date...
DONT get me wrong, it is music to my ears how IPR is denied and the court jumps imediately to change the documents.
Do you have any idea how to interpret this?
Sounds BIG. And in SFOR's favor.
IMO
I believe this may be going to trial and the three have to remove all their prior contensions because they dont apply anymore due to the PTAB dismissing all of their claims. Trial means treble damages if it doesnt already. But im sure they can give up and just pay the piper treble if they choose to.
So if Duo is being sued for $30M. Times three would be $90M. They are up $h!ts creek without a paddle. This may drain Duo of all their new funding any profits they may have made to date...
DONT get me wrong, it is music to my ears how IPR is denied and the court jumps imediately to change the documents.
Do you have any idea how to interpret this?
Sounds BIG. And in SFOR's favor.
IMO
(1)
(0)