exactly my point re: potentials and possibilities
Post# of 43064
imo the aspects one needs to sell a disruptive tech .. is passion and tenacity ..
>> curiosity and an ability to present solutions/solve problems .. is a given
this is why i suspect RH went from Eco to RC .. without missing a beat .. which again would have been fine if either/or had delivered (and RC may still) .. but what is harder for many imo to deal with .. is the total lack of *vision* for want of a better word being articulated consistently to actual P2O investors
again i'm not in any way advocating for a R/S .. NR who is clearly upside down on PTOI ... because that is the only aspect that makes sense regarding their daily bombardment of here and there .. would just re-short if a R/S was done without mgmt executing tactics and strategies ..
bottom line is RH's hand gets forced to some degree in *imo* early 2018 .. i'd like to believe the folks who funded monies last August/September (2016) are also asking questions of RH's *vision and intent*
4kids
Quote:
I could live with a reverse split if it came with a team of professionals capable of moving this company forward. We have stagnated long enough. Nothing of significance has happened since John B. stepped away. I would take the bad press his return would generate any day to have some passion and drive interjected back into the comp