well what i'd like to see .. is the plant brought
Post# of 43064
and the blending site leased to offset (perhaps minimally) P2O's burn rate
since the PPS has been mostly @ 10c or below since EOY 2013 .. my thinking
is there will have to be a R/S for the above to be executed .. that said the only
way i'd want that *possibility* is if RH can execute ancillary material events in parallel .. something *imo* that RH hasn't shown abilities of ..
this would be .. filing his form/s .. seating an indy BoD .. holding an AGM to share *vision* and *intent* .. and then having the plans in place for both 2 and 3 to come back online (time frames .. equipment sourced and staff at the ready)
but that is just me .. it's quite possible that both sites get sold and 2 and 3 go elsewhere .. perhaps to a JV or possible partner ..
i have no issues with P2O not being seamless or aspects forcing a change out of a prior belief .. what i have a problem with is consistent lack of communication when one is running a pubco ..
and sorry about my delay .. unexpected travel in play
4kids
Quote:
and which of these options, in your mind, will benefit long time shareholders?
Pardon the delay, but I'm in Rick's backyard this weekend...