again this was noted in March 2016 after Eco Nav (
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 242)
Posted On: 10/14/2017 5:39:24 PM
Re: Commando911 #37566
again this was noted in March 2016 after Eco Nav (which some whined about consistently on SMBs as not producing) went by the wayside ..
http://www.plastic2oil.com/site/news-releases...ve-officer
so to come back to what has been reiterated to you numerous times as this *dance* gets replayed *consistently*
was an internal sales team brought into P2O in April of 2016?
since the answer is *no* .. that leaves current mgmt to *sell* P2O's tech
which clearly RH *presumed* via RC's efforts (having been done previously
with a competitor) that would bear fruit .. and discovered the real world of MOU
version 1 .. becoming MOU version 2 .. which may or may not be *consummated*
(as noted earlier to you .. mgmt focusing on one thing can prove problematic hence the ability for some to do ancillary material events in parallel)
anyhow it has been answered .. what remains being *Consistently* unanswered is what is an actual P2O investor to do about mgmt's *choices* .. or lack thereof
4kids
Quote:
Over the next few weeks, we will be sharing important information with you regarding the sales and marketing program that we intend to launch. Our efforts will include direct sales as well as a new partnership. To that end, we made the decision not to further extend our agreement with EcoNavigation as their firm has been unable to conclude processor sales via acceptable terms.
http://www.plastic2oil.com/site/news-releases...ve-officer
so to come back to what has been reiterated to you numerous times as this *dance* gets replayed *consistently*
was an internal sales team brought into P2O in April of 2016?
since the answer is *no* .. that leaves current mgmt to *sell* P2O's tech
which clearly RH *presumed* via RC's efforts (having been done previously
with a competitor) that would bear fruit .. and discovered the real world of MOU
version 1 .. becoming MOU version 2 .. which may or may not be *consummated*
(as noted earlier to you .. mgmt focusing on one thing can prove problematic hence the ability for some to do ancillary material events in parallel)
anyhow it has been answered .. what remains being *Consistently* unanswered is what is an actual P2O investor to do about mgmt's *choices* .. or lack thereof
4kids
Quote:
I’m sorry, but I really don’t see the answer in your response. Does anyone else see it?
(1)
(1)