hasn't been deflected .. it's been answered .. who replaced the external sales team ECO Nav provided .. for the internal sales' effort?
no one
RH noted in March 2016 .. *intent* .. that has yet to see daylight about 1.5 years later
just my opinion but presuming that with RC being worked (again presuming directly by RH) ..some of March 2016's *intent* went to hold status .. wihich will work if deal is consummated in total .. instead as RH discovered MOU went to MOU version 2 ..
reasons why *many* do ancillary aspects in parallel vs focusing on just one item
and if any actual investor got the answer directly out of mgmt .. i'd be surprised
because *communication* isn't what this mgmt team is known for *imo*
which is why Shareholder Updates* are getting scarcer than hen's teeth ..
5 in 2015
3 in 2016
1 in 2017
http://www.plastic2oil.com/site/news-releases
so the ? has been asked .. and the ? has been answered numerous times
and every adult here knows that RH has a fiduciary responsibility to actual P2O shareholders .. but it always come back to what does get diverted and deflected
beyond PP's oft noted *emailing* of the company .. what exactly are P2O shareholders to do *specifically* ..
4kids
no one
RH noted in March 2016 .. *intent* .. that has yet to see daylight about 1.5 years later
just my opinion but presuming that with RC being worked (again presuming directly by RH) ..some of March 2016's *intent* went to hold status .. wihich will work if deal is consummated in total .. instead as RH discovered MOU went to MOU version 2 ..
reasons why *many* do ancillary aspects in parallel vs focusing on just one item
and if any actual investor got the answer directly out of mgmt .. i'd be surprised
because *communication* isn't what this mgmt team is known for *imo*
which is why Shareholder Updates* are getting scarcer than hen's teeth ..
5 in 2015
3 in 2016
1 in 2017
http://www.plastic2oil.com/site/news-releases
so the ? has been asked .. and the ? has been answered numerous times
and every adult here knows that RH has a fiduciary responsibility to actual P2O shareholders .. but it always come back to what does get diverted and deflected
beyond PP's oft noted *emailing* of the company .. what exactly are P2O shareholders to do *specifically* ..
4kids
..Quote:
My question, which is always deflected and diverted, basically unanswered is “why is it sooooo hard to sell the world class, paradigm changing, best tech ever in pyrolysis sector machine?
Many other companies have had machines permitted and set up across other states.
Why is the BEST technology unable to find a buyer, or as we have been told, unable to get permitted? I thought if we could get permitted in one of the most rigid states, NYS, we would get permitted anywhere?
Why hasn’t management explained that??
Certainly makes one wonder how good the machine is. I’ve seen it run, but I don’t have the expertise to judge the technical parameters to make a conclusion on just how good the machine is or isn’t.
This is a VERY serious question that all of us longs should be asking.
Something is amiss, IMO
1
1
