pretty much HC.. tho' one immediately comes to
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 282)
Posted On: 10/11/2017 8:33:06 PM
pretty much HC..
tho' one immediately comes to mind as a non investment .. that was *imo* part
of NRs' stable circa 2007 forward until self imploding (Penson) for obvious reasons
of course the multi/s rarely relo onto other targets .. they just create another alias
to *stalk* .. fortunately as has been noted a few times .. they tend to stick out like a sore thumb
to say nothing of an inability to disguise *patterns* ..
so nice to see the focus broadening on this fair and balanced site .. (sarcasm)
4kids
response in its entirety ..
of course that immediately springs to mind (edit and since sarcasm doesn't convey well via posts .. that was *sarcasm*) .. clearly you haven't done any DD
on what has transpired with some of those friends and family .. or you are fishing
but with that said .. i find it beyond disingenuous that anyone spends any time
on any SMB where they don't hold a financial interest .. this has never been about entertainment (as some claim) .. it's about targets that outlast and the odds
are never in their favor .. rather in the favor of those criminal elements who can
almost always control outcomes
every aspect at every turn has been maligned re: P2O .. but what is truly telling imo is the focus by *some* on events that were ignored to suit (2008/2009) by those tasked with *overview* and *regulations* .. that magically became an issue
for P2O .. because of course by that time (Sept 2010) .. the handoff by the originals .. was an EPIC FAIL ..
again .. there is a difference of compressing the PPS and actually getting investors to sell their shares
that was 7 years ago ..
4kids
"you are the 2nd hit piece author on P2O .. which like the first hit piece author and an elgindy protege .. had a direct impact on PTOI .. imagine that"
Quote:
My article was completely accurate in every respect. I didn't receive a dime for it--it was solely for the benefit of investors who I believe were getting swindled. Even after everything played out, you can see how the article is still relevant--there are still continuous delays on starting up this supposedly wildly profitable processor. Anyone who listened to me five years ago, saved a boatload. Five years was plenty of time for PTOI to prove me wrong...yet they didn't because an extra $20M or so just still wasn't quite enough to start up the processor.
Here's an angle you haven't considered...what if the founder, with several hundred thousand dollars from friends and family from his Expedite2 shell, decided to do a sham operation again with a new shell called 310 Holdings/JBII/PTOI??...this time with a story about a secret catalyst, along with a bunch of half truths and outright lies, and sold the garbage-to-gold story to investors?? What if PTOI's Mr. Bordynuik got rich by his design, rather than merely accidentally getting rich paying himself handsomely while the company kept failing??
What if PTOI founder, Mr. Bordynuik, simply pulled a 'green' penny stock swindle like many other penny stock operators routinely do because the money is extraordinarily easy?? All it takes is a half truth and a lot of hype. Is it possible investors lost money because PTOI's process was grossly misrepresented to them by PTOI itself, which convinced them to buy a worthless sham at an extraordinarily high price...and then the real reason for the 'relentless compression' of the share price might have been due to investors slowly figuring out that PTOI's processor really couldn't produce diesel for under $10/bbl or $0.25/gallon??
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=479...z4vFaRIefN
tho' one immediately comes to mind as a non investment .. that was *imo* part
of NRs' stable circa 2007 forward until self imploding (Penson) for obvious reasons
of course the multi/s rarely relo onto other targets .. they just create another alias
to *stalk* .. fortunately as has been noted a few times .. they tend to stick out like a sore thumb
to say nothing of an inability to disguise *patterns* ..
so nice to see the focus broadening on this fair and balanced site .. (sarcasm)
4kids
response in its entirety ..
of course that immediately springs to mind (edit and since sarcasm doesn't convey well via posts .. that was *sarcasm*) .. clearly you haven't done any DD
on what has transpired with some of those friends and family .. or you are fishing
but with that said .. i find it beyond disingenuous that anyone spends any time
on any SMB where they don't hold a financial interest .. this has never been about entertainment (as some claim) .. it's about targets that outlast and the odds
are never in their favor .. rather in the favor of those criminal elements who can
almost always control outcomes
every aspect at every turn has been maligned re: P2O .. but what is truly telling imo is the focus by *some* on events that were ignored to suit (2008/2009) by those tasked with *overview* and *regulations* .. that magically became an issue
for P2O .. because of course by that time (Sept 2010) .. the handoff by the originals .. was an EPIC FAIL ..
again .. there is a difference of compressing the PPS and actually getting investors to sell their shares
that was 7 years ago ..
4kids
"you are the 2nd hit piece author on P2O .. which like the first hit piece author and an elgindy protege .. had a direct impact on PTOI .. imagine that"
Quote:
My article was completely accurate in every respect. I didn't receive a dime for it--it was solely for the benefit of investors who I believe were getting swindled. Even after everything played out, you can see how the article is still relevant--there are still continuous delays on starting up this supposedly wildly profitable processor. Anyone who listened to me five years ago, saved a boatload. Five years was plenty of time for PTOI to prove me wrong...yet they didn't because an extra $20M or so just still wasn't quite enough to start up the processor.
Here's an angle you haven't considered...what if the founder, with several hundred thousand dollars from friends and family from his Expedite2 shell, decided to do a sham operation again with a new shell called 310 Holdings/JBII/PTOI??...this time with a story about a secret catalyst, along with a bunch of half truths and outright lies, and sold the garbage-to-gold story to investors?? What if PTOI's Mr. Bordynuik got rich by his design, rather than merely accidentally getting rich paying himself handsomely while the company kept failing??
What if PTOI founder, Mr. Bordynuik, simply pulled a 'green' penny stock swindle like many other penny stock operators routinely do because the money is extraordinarily easy?? All it takes is a half truth and a lot of hype. Is it possible investors lost money because PTOI's process was grossly misrepresented to them by PTOI itself, which convinced them to buy a worthless sham at an extraordinarily high price...and then the real reason for the 'relentless compression' of the share price might have been due to investors slowly figuring out that PTOI's processor really couldn't produce diesel for under $10/bbl or $0.25/gallon??
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=479...z4vFaRIefN
(1)
(0)