again .. there is a difference of compressing the

Quote:

---

again .. there is a difference of compressing the PPS and actually getting investors to sell their shares

that was 7 years ago ..

---

Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=479...z4vE2J1SFS

which is why the *set up* of 2011 had to get underway ..

because of course those who hadn't sold on the first round (take down) May 2010
into Dec 2010 .. might if the PPS was taken back *UP* on *volume* (hence the
to this day record setting volume month of 8M~ on PTOI of April 2011) and the
subsequent efforts .. (Jan 2012) .. and telegraphed by sub tiers of the original
criminal element in Dec 2011 .. (after the events of the summer of 2011) most
assuredly would *capture* some legit sells by early 2012 ..

and so it would go ..

it's why *volume* matters .. tapes of trades to reflect the *honesty* of that volume matters .. copies of RT l2 .. matter specific to decoys' utilized and MMs' actually reporting .. and why most with basic business skill sets understand the *effect* a relentlessly compressed PPS would have on any company's ability to raise capital .. let alone execute

current CEO *imo* clearly believed sales of P2O's tech were en route (audio last AGM 12/13) .. so did the founder .. clearly (as was noted here recently) they were mistaken .. that month PTOI would be @ 10c .. 2 weeks later PTOI would be at 6c

today .. almost 4 years onward .. PTOI sits at approx 1c and P2O still survives

no true investor cheers the shitty PPS or the lousy communication skill sets of the CEO

but i'll take that and the company *surviving* .. vs the alternative .. and *imo* mgmt does have to communicate *intent* .. if for no other reason .. *money* and assets and decsions having to be made b4 too much longer

4kids