for the most part regarding your post i totally a

for the most part regarding your post i totally agree .. i come back to what do you want from actual P2O investors .. and what specifically can this SMB do to change aspects as they currently stand with P2O's mgmt?

btw .. as for this ..

Quote:

---

Intent was to get #3 going in the absence of sales going forward..with the infusion of the last financing

---

i actually need to check what was filed with that last infusion of 600k (Aug/Sept 2016) re: intent as specifically noted then

and for this ..

Quote:

---

We had a year with ECO...nothing...and now until the end of the year with RC ?.

---

some may remember *posts* bitching about ECO's lack of progress (forget instant vilification) .. while others commented on the time frame given to ECO not being long enough b4 the plug got pulled .. this is a multi million $ tech being deployed .. which isn't done in days *imo*

which brings me to RC (who was a hero of the trolls and crew working IHUB for
years because of implementing a competitor's tech b4) .. this *MOU version 2*
imo may take far longer if the site being utilized has no infrastructure vs say a
site that already had some time saving advantages in place .. again my comment
about RC is that no company should have all their eggs in one basket which
has never changed

so to be clear .. it is not an issue of being patient .. at all .. it's what can anyone *here* do?

which notice *never* gets a response ..

4kids

Quote:

---

I'm not interested in that anymore...we've been aware of "intent" for the last few years...it has produced zero results ...to the best knowledge of shareholders. Whether that be a communication issue more than actual lack of results is anyone's guess..I'm not going to argue the point. Intent was to get #3 going in the absence of sales going forward..with the infusion of the last financing...we got nothing. We had a year with ECO...nothing...and now until the end of the year with RC ?... I'm assuming.... all the while generating no revenue..no options assumed...and no communication. Would you consider this whining...or fact checking? or simply relating to management "intent"...?? Geezz..maybe that's why he doesn't communicate with us....intent has blown up more than a few times...

There's no need for FT management...if there's no FT need. pretty simple. As a matter of fact...PTOI has all the management it needs with its current state.

At this point, the wish list has been chiseled away...seating a Board, FT Management, multiple JV's/sites, etc...to where the hope is to file...simply file......until someone who REALLY cares about and wants to engage full time in this alternative energy/environmental movement grabs the reins... not a an enviable position for shareholders....

what? haven't been patient enough??

---

Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=479...z4vDdP6w00