IHUB's board is DOA and has been for over a year d
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 1032)
Posted On: 10/08/2017 4:53:23 PM
IHUB's board is DOA and has been for over a year due to the *balance* (sarcasm) being 99.99% negative ..
clearly the threat isn't me (i'm one investor among 1000s)
it's the data provided that is the threat to the criminal enterprise
(curating trading data on OTC targets that still survive)
in alignment with who *reports* re: MM Monthly and the %s
now allocated by Finra .. something i did by rote .. ironically long b4 Finra undertook the effort
it's astounding to see the evolution from when info first went live (2/10)
based on the *fact* that original crews' working IHUB .. noted CONsistently
that there was no such thing as a short on an OTC stock .. i kid you not
how many *investors* sucked up that BS (manipulation) as *fact* by crews?
equally interesting to me is the *belief* that what occurred in 2009/2010/2011
would have no impact on P2O's ability to execute .. as if the arrival of RH in
mid August 2013 would be seamless and due to osmosis .. *awareness* of
all those external efforts (every single one of them) .. which is why when i
note NRs' intent .. i tend to focus on what transpired from Jan 2013 onward
the *efforts* of the summer of 2013 .. and the install of RH in mid August 2013
.. the infusion of $Multiple Million$ on 9.30.13 (35c pps) and the subsequent
take down .. notable by EOY 2013 (10c) .. Jan 2014 (6c) .. ACC Executive
Summary Oct 2014 (5c) where PTOI would be held for well over 2 + years
until just about a year ago when 600k was sourced by 2 investors .. (pps from
memory so i could be off .. was about 4 to 5c) .. and the last round on ever
reduced volume
(again trolls/NR and various crews *mistakenly* conflate dollar value expended
vs a share for a share)
culminating in 2017 .. where PTOI's volume is essentially non existent
and every trade that gets claimed .. almost always has mirrored efforts
i totally understand actual investors' frustrations with time passing and seemingly
very little out of mgmt to show for it .. i'd be more concerned if there was
actually true competition that was *publicly traded* .. or if mgmt didn't have
numerous options .. but i have zero respect for those who are part of the criminal
enterprise who treated the OTC as the playground it became for years
and are significantly upside down on PTOI (among other OTC survivors
who display the same pattern of reduced volume married to a relentlessly
compressed PPS)
i keep waiting for all the *negativity* trotted out daily to translate to actual *volume* (as in actual investors selling)
so far it hasn't happened .. and if it does change .. it will be noted via the documentation
4kids
clearly the threat isn't me (i'm one investor among 1000s)
it's the data provided that is the threat to the criminal enterprise
(curating trading data on OTC targets that still survive)
in alignment with who *reports* re: MM Monthly and the %s
now allocated by Finra .. something i did by rote .. ironically long b4 Finra undertook the effort
it's astounding to see the evolution from when info first went live (2/10)
based on the *fact* that original crews' working IHUB .. noted CONsistently
that there was no such thing as a short on an OTC stock .. i kid you not
how many *investors* sucked up that BS (manipulation) as *fact* by crews?
equally interesting to me is the *belief* that what occurred in 2009/2010/2011
would have no impact on P2O's ability to execute .. as if the arrival of RH in
mid August 2013 would be seamless and due to osmosis .. *awareness* of
all those external efforts (every single one of them) .. which is why when i
note NRs' intent .. i tend to focus on what transpired from Jan 2013 onward
the *efforts* of the summer of 2013 .. and the install of RH in mid August 2013
.. the infusion of $Multiple Million$ on 9.30.13 (35c pps) and the subsequent
take down .. notable by EOY 2013 (10c) .. Jan 2014 (6c) .. ACC Executive
Summary Oct 2014 (5c) where PTOI would be held for well over 2 + years
until just about a year ago when 600k was sourced by 2 investors .. (pps from
memory so i could be off .. was about 4 to 5c) .. and the last round on ever
reduced volume
(again trolls/NR and various crews *mistakenly* conflate dollar value expended
vs a share for a share)
culminating in 2017 .. where PTOI's volume is essentially non existent
and every trade that gets claimed .. almost always has mirrored efforts
i totally understand actual investors' frustrations with time passing and seemingly
very little out of mgmt to show for it .. i'd be more concerned if there was
actually true competition that was *publicly traded* .. or if mgmt didn't have
numerous options .. but i have zero respect for those who are part of the criminal
enterprise who treated the OTC as the playground it became for years
and are significantly upside down on PTOI (among other OTC survivors
who display the same pattern of reduced volume married to a relentlessly
compressed PPS)
i keep waiting for all the *negativity* trotted out daily to translate to actual *volume* (as in actual investors selling)
so far it hasn't happened .. and if it does change .. it will be noted via the documentation
4kids
Quote:
Thank god 4k is a moderator here! Otherwise this would just be another Ihub. Didn't the founder of Ihub go to jail? Ihub is designed to assist those who illegally naked short companies such as P2O. This is not Ihub!
(1)
(0)