See item 83 below. Posters were backing the compan
Post# of 7795
(Total Views: 192)
Posted On: 09/20/2017 2:09:37 PM
Re: Coat Tail Rider #3534
See item 83 below. Posters were backing the company's claims, though one said it was the beach and not Area 2.
SFRX says this information is readily available, but no one has been able to find it. Sinclair didn't know and the BAR didn't have any info either.
Regardless, item 83 and other BS in the complaint filed was PUMPED by the ad agency. Much of it is now known to be FALSE. The 80/20, the complete "transition" to a recovery permit, and according to Sinclair the coins being found.
Enjoy. It's was a pathetic attempt to keep lenders off Kyle's back.....imho.
https://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/281084501/S...Volentine#
SFRX says this information is readily available, but no one has been able to find it. Sinclair didn't know and the BAR didn't have any info either.
Regardless, item 83 and other BS in the complaint filed was PUMPED by the ad agency. Much of it is now known to be FALSE. The 80/20, the complete "transition" to a recovery permit, and according to Sinclair the coins being found.
Enjoy. It's was a pathetic attempt to keep lenders off Kyle's back.....imho.
https://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/281084501/S...Volentine#
(0)
(0)Seafarer Exploration (SFRX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼