Actually it's not 'both parties'. One party be
Post# of 125034
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ac52/8ac52b4778ac83db017b4108416c7dab41af72ae" alt=""
One party believes in and enforces 'environmental protection', the other prefers profits over health. The record is clear on that.
I don't dispute the damage to the food chain nor to the shallower lakes, but don't kid yourself that one political Party is as concerned as the other about our environment.
USED to be more bipartisan, at least when Nixon created the EPA.
Here's the appropriate metaphor for Pruitt:
https://morningconsult.com/opinions/pruitts-e...-henhouse/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6129c/6129c37a1084aa51a9aad0a48fbaafe917c16dcc" alt="Like This Post"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2afd3/2afd37d70555658bad2875d9bb65d1937c8e7c70" alt="Dislike This Post"